2018
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.9.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical characterization of single nanometer-wide Si fins in dense arrays

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the development of a methodology using the micro four-point probe (μ4PP) technique to electrically characterize single nanometer-wide fins arranged in dense arrays. We show that through the concept of carefully controlling the electrical contact formation process, the electrical measurement can be confined to one individual fin although the used measurement electrodes physically contact more than one fin. We demonstrate that we can precisely measure the resistance of individual ca. 20 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for phase 2, we propose a new method allowing for excellent control of the contact resistance of the created electrical contacts. Finally, we show that the electrical contact formation is similar on more confined structures such as fins, where the precise control of the electrical contact is needed for measuring single fins in dense arrays …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, for phase 2, we propose a new method allowing for excellent control of the contact resistance of the created electrical contacts. Finally, we show that the electrical contact formation is similar on more confined structures such as fins, where the precise control of the electrical contact is needed for measuring single fins in dense arrays …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Note that the measurement of R 1 and R 2 is done using the extra two electrodes 3 and 4 (not shown in Figure a) of our microprobes after forming the corrrespoding electrical contacts R 3 and R 4 with a high current (>500 μA; Figure b) to ensure a low contact resistance (i.e., R 3 , R 4 << R 1 , R 2 ). Here, because the Si sample is highly doped, R sample is much lower than the contact resistances (i.e., R sample << R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , R 4 ) and can thus be neglected, making that all contact resistances can be obtained using a series of independent two‐point measurements. For example, R 1 is extracted using R 1 = 0.5 × ( R 1–3 + R 1–4 − R 3–4 ), where R 1–3 is the two‐point measurements between electrodes 1 and 3.…”
Section: The Electrical Contacting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 Indeed, characterizing the electrical properties of these features, which can be impacted by their nanoscale dimensions via, e.g., size-dependent dopant activation, diffusion, and recrystallization, [3][4][5] often requires metrology that is able to probe variations in dopant/carrier concentration within a few nanometers and with high accuracy. 2,6 For example, while a width-dependent sheet resistance has been observed in B-implanted Si fins using the micro four-point probe (μ4PP) [7][8][9][10] technique, this technique alone is not sufficient to characterize the (local) electrical properties of these structures. Additionally, scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM) 2,11,12 measurements are difficult to quantify for such nanometer scaled features, as the measured spreading resistance is easily impacted by parasitic series resistances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%