1995
DOI: 10.1139/e95-127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity structure of the Purcell Anticlinorium in southeast British Columbia and northwest Montana

Abstract: Magnetotelluric data from almost 200 sites were acquired by a commercial contractor over the Precambrian Purcell Anticlinorium west of the Rocky Mountains of Canada and the United States. Fifteen east-west profiles cross the anticlinorium between latitudes of 48 and 49.5"N, and provide a grid suitable for a regional three-dimensional study of the electrical structure of predominantly the upper crust. The data show essentially a resistive uppermost crust, varying from 2 to 6 km in thickness, over a strongly con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulphides have previously been observed to increase conductivity significantly over large regional areas (e.g., Cook and Jones, 1995;Gupta and Jones, 1995). The high anisotropy in the hand sample explains the observed lack of response for currents crossing the body at this location .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Sulphides have previously been observed to increase conductivity significantly over large regional areas (e.g., Cook and Jones, 1995;Gupta and Jones, 1995). The high anisotropy in the hand sample explains the observed lack of response for currents crossing the body at this location .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The most complete regional geophysical information for the Gupta and Jones, 1995;Ritter and Ritter, 1997]. In our case, typical errors associated with these vectors are almost as large as the vectors themselves; the poor quality of these vectors mitigate using them in quantitative analysis.…”
Section: From Seismic Informationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Relevant studies include Chakridi et al (1992), Jones and Dumas (1993), Eisel and Bahr (1993), , Kurtz et al (1993), Ogawa et al (1994), Marquis et al (1995), Boerner et al (1995), and Gupta and Jones (1995). Physically, the 3D galvanic distortion is caused by the presence of electric charges along discontinuities or gradients in electrical conductivity associated with small-scale (relative to the background inductive scale length) surface structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%