1979
DOI: 10.1049/el:19790065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical properties of coplanar transmission lines on lossless and lossy substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further validate the presented method, the characteristic impedance test results of ANFIS model are compared with the MMICTL [23] and measured [24][25][26] results in Figure 5. It is clear from this figure that the ANFIS results agree quite well with the results of measured works and also with the results of MMICTL.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to further validate the presented method, the characteristic impedance test results of ANFIS model are compared with the MMICTL [23] and measured [24][25][26] results in Figure 5. It is clear from this figure that the ANFIS results agree quite well with the results of measured works and also with the results of MMICTL.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are small differences between the ANFIS model results and the experimental results. These differences are expected because it is assumed that the ground planes extend to infinity and the conductor thicknesses are zero for the ANFIS models, however, the CPW structures of the experimental works [24][25][26] have finite size ground planes in the range of 1270.0 µm and 3505.2 µm, and the CMT [3] ANFIS Measured [26] MMICTL [23] (c) S = 508 µm, h = 635 µm, and ε r = 9.6 Figure 5. Comparison of the measured and calculated characteristic impedances obtained by using ANFIS, CMT [3], and MMICTL [23] for CCPWs.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Side and plan views of the coplanar waveguide geometry. Opto-electronic sampling using coplanar waveguides plane, and an impedance slightly less than 50Q [12]. Gap widths were 10, 20 of 50 pm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%