1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1995.tb06436.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistivity model of the crust and upper mantle from a magnetotelluric survey through the central Pyrenees

Abstract: SUMMARY An MT profile which roughly coincides with the south side of the ECORS‐Pyrenees deep reflection seismic profile was made from the North Pyrenean zone through the central Pyrenees and Ebro basin. The periods recorded ranged from 0.0128s to 2000s. Analysis of MT data shows a 2‐D conductive structure. The strike direction of the structure is E‐W, parallel to the Pyrenean chain. Interpretation of the data includes geomagnetic transfer functions and is constrained by some relevant geometric crustal features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
34
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sénéchal et al (1996), for instance, through coupled shear wave splitting measurements and magnetotelluric soundings along a transect in the Canadian shield, retrieved similar directions of anisotropy from both datasets and, considering that the measured electrical anisotropy originates between 50 and 150 km, they concluded that the seismic anisotropy also originates from a well-defined fabric in the lithospheric upper mantle fabric. Similar preliminary results have been obtained in the Appalachians (Wannamaker et al, 1996) and the Pyrenees (Pous et al, 1995;M. Daignières, pers.…”
Section: Tectonic Fabric Of the Continental Lithospheric Mantlesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sénéchal et al (1996), for instance, through coupled shear wave splitting measurements and magnetotelluric soundings along a transect in the Canadian shield, retrieved similar directions of anisotropy from both datasets and, considering that the measured electrical anisotropy originates between 50 and 150 km, they concluded that the seismic anisotropy also originates from a well-defined fabric in the lithospheric upper mantle fabric. Similar preliminary results have been obtained in the Appalachians (Wannamaker et al, 1996) and the Pyrenees (Pous et al, 1995;M. Daignières, pers.…”
Section: Tectonic Fabric Of the Continental Lithospheric Mantlesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…(f) Magnetotelluric soundings in the Pyrenees (Pous et al, 1995) have imaged a steeply dipping boundary that penetrates into the upper mantle beneath the North Pyrenean fault, suggesting that the fault crosscuts the Moho. Electrical anisotropy measurements in the Canadian shield (Sénéchal et al, 1996) and the eastern US (Wannamaker et al, 1996) show a very good agreement between the directions of conductivity anisotropy in the upper mantle and the crustal tectonic fabric, suggesting that the mantle and the crustal fabrics are similar.…”
Section: Rheology Of the Lithospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We practiced either with a uniform ground conductivity of σ = 0.001 S/m (as in Torta et al 2012) or with different layered conductivity models. For the latter, we chose either the electrical resistivity model given by Pous et al (1995) for the Ebre basin or the 1-D ground model of the #29 block in Figure 2 by Viljanen et al (2012). In Table 4, we give the linear correlation coefficients for each case, but in our opinion, this measure is not always the best indicator for quantifying the goodness of such model performances.…”
Section: Comparisons With Gic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured GIC is in red. The results are from analyses that used either a uniform ground conductivity set to 0.001 S/m (blue), a layered conductivity structure according to Pous et al (1995) (green), a layered conductivity structure according to Viljanen et al (2012) (black), or a uniform ground conductivity under the condition where the Vandellòs-Pierola transmission line was switched off (pink). one lies in the fact that Torta et al (2012) used the timedomain integral approach to infer the electric field from the geomagnetic variation data by setting M equal to just 30 min.…”
Section: Comparisons With Gic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a model of electrical resistivity from magnetotelluric measurements, which includes a NS profile from the Pyrenees to near the Mediterranean coast along about the meridian 1 E [Pous et al, 1995], it can be observed that it varies strongly with depth and, specially, below a depth of 30 km, with the latitude as well. Due to the relatively low frequency of the phenomena under concern, small-scale conductivity anomalies near the surface are not important when calculating the geoelectric field that causes the GIC, as these fields penetrate to a certain depth.…”
Section: Gic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%