2017
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical stimulation reduces smokers’ craving by modulating the coupling between dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus

Abstract: Applying electrical stimulation over the prefrontal cortex can help nicotine dependents reduce cigarette craving. However, the underlying mechanism remains ambiguous. This study investigates this issue with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Thirty-two male chronic smokers received real and sham stimulation over dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) separated by 1 week. The neuroimaging data of the resting state, the smoking cue-reactivity task and the emotion task after stimulation were collected. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, a diminution of craving was observed after active tDCS sessions as compared to sham but we did not observe a cumulative effect of sessions on craving diminution. The reduction of smoking craving observed after tDCS is consistent with studies showing that tDCS reduced cue-induced craving 10 , 11 , 13 , 39 and background/tonic smoking craving 10 . The distinct effects of tDCS on smoking and craving suggested distinct brain underpinnings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Namely, a diminution of craving was observed after active tDCS sessions as compared to sham but we did not observe a cumulative effect of sessions on craving diminution. The reduction of smoking craving observed after tDCS is consistent with studies showing that tDCS reduced cue-induced craving 10 , 11 , 13 , 39 and background/tonic smoking craving 10 . The distinct effects of tDCS on smoking and craving suggested distinct brain underpinnings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Stimulating TPJ, no matter the left or right part, shared the same mechanism of influencing the mPFC. This hypothesis is consistent with the recent network explanation of the tDCS effect …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Before gaming, males demonstrated greater activation of the right striatum, a region implicated in reward processing (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015 ). Activity in the ventral striatum may influence motivated or goal-directed behaviors (Ikemoto et al , 2015 ; Sayette, 2016 ) and reward processing including in addictions (Balodis and Potenza, 2015 ; Cheng et al , 2016 ; Tobler et al , 2016 ; Yang et al , 2017 ). The striatum may also be activated when individuals are exposed to stimuli related to addictions (Balodis et al , 2012 ; Worhunsky et al , 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%