Proceedings 19th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. VTS 2001
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2001.923441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically induced stimuli for MEMS self-test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, MEMS characteristics depend on the properties and the quality of the package used. As a result, the cost of MEMS testing can be prohibitive [34].…”
Section: Analog Rf and Mems Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, MEMS characteristics depend on the properties and the quality of the package used. As a result, the cost of MEMS testing can be prohibitive [34].…”
Section: Analog Rf and Mems Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then a few other methodologies, following similar approaches, have been proposed for accelerometer testing (Charlot et al 2001;Mir et al 2006;Olbrich et al 1997;Puers and Reyntjens 2002;Xiong et al 2005). The test is limited to the verification whether the mass is free to move and an electrical signal is used to stimulate the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests that are run after fabrication, under different operating conditions, ensure that only suitable devices are commercialized. However, these tests are very costly: a typical figure is that one third of the cost of a micro-fabricated device is due to testing [5]. An alternative is to integrate self-test (and self-tuning) features, such as parameter estimation routines, in each device, so that it can compensate the fabrication dispersions and adapt to changing conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%