2015
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2015.2421356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically Small Metamaterial-Inspired Tri-Band Antenna With Meta-Mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Reference [9] the antenna size is bigger than all and applicable for GSM frequency bands. The designed metamaterial embedded antenna has the total bandwidth of 220 MHz (2.38 to 2.60 GHz) and 390 MHz (3.40 to 3.79 GHz), whereas in References [15,16], the antennae had larger bandwidth but single band as well as applicable for only WiFi, WiMAX and WiMAX applications, respectively. Moreover, the gain of proposed metamaterial antenna was 2.25 dBi while in References [10,18] the antennae had larger gain 3.59 and 2.95 dBi but applicable for Bluetooth, WiMAX and WiFi, WiMAX applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Reference [9] the antenna size is bigger than all and applicable for GSM frequency bands. The designed metamaterial embedded antenna has the total bandwidth of 220 MHz (2.38 to 2.60 GHz) and 390 MHz (3.40 to 3.79 GHz), whereas in References [15,16], the antennae had larger bandwidth but single band as well as applicable for only WiFi, WiMAX and WiMAX applications, respectively. Moreover, the gain of proposed metamaterial antenna was 2.25 dBi while in References [10,18] the antennae had larger gain 3.59 and 2.95 dBi but applicable for Bluetooth, WiMAX and WiFi, WiMAX applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gummalla et al [9] 100 × 60 100, 430 0.66, 1.74 GSM Saghati et al [10] 80 × 80 100, 190 2.33, 3.59 Bluetooth, WiMAX Martínez et al [11] 40 × 30 230, 220 1.4, 1.7 Bluetooth, WiMAX Dong et al [12] 34 × 34 100 2.02 WiFi Kasem et al [13] 40 × 35 500, 200, 250 -WLAN, RFID Li et al [14] 35 × 35 60, 680 1.7, 1.74 WiMAX Bala et al [15] 40 × 45 530 1.5 WiFi, WiMAX Zhu et al [16] 38 × 35 520 2.15 WiMAX Sarkar et al [17] 50 × 50 100, 210, 250 -GSM, UMTS, WLAN Abed et al [18] 70 × 50 260, 350 2.95 WiFi, WiMAX Nandi et al [19] 45 × 25 270, 150 −2, 0.14 WLAN, WiMAX Assimonis et al [22] 297…”
Section: References Dimensions (Mm 2 ) Bandwidth (Mhz) Gain (Dbi) Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1][2][3][4][5], dual-band antennas covering 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz bands were proposed for wireless local area network (WLAN) applications. In [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], attempts were made to develop antennas for WLAN/WiMAX applications, including π-shaped slotted microstrip antennas with aperture-coupled feed [6], resonator antennas [7][8][9], dual and multipolarized antennas [10][11][12], magnetoelectric and magnetic dipole antennas [13,14], frequency-reconfigurable antennas using PIN-diode switch [15][16][17][18], metamaterial antennas [19][20][21], antennas with inverted-L-shaped radiating elements and parasitic elements in the ground plane [22], antennas with pentagonal ring slot fed at the vertex and E-slip with backfeeding [23], and antenna with bow-tie slot in a single metal sheet on top of the flexible substrate [24]. However, these antennas fail to cover the entire WLAN frequency band (2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts of compact multi-band antennas are useful in the recent wireless communication systems such as Bluetooth, global positioning system, wireless local area network, wireless fidelity, worldwide interoperability for microwave access etc. to overcome the interference between other frequency bands and also individually tune the near and far-field properties [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%