“…We base this on (1) the large difference in midpoint potential of a {Mb-PSS} n multilayer on pyrolitic graphite compared with that of Mb in solution, (2) the similar pH dependence of the midpoint potential of a {Mb-PSS} n multilayer on pyrolitic graphite and adsorbed heme, (3) the similar coverage of a {Mb-PSS} 6 multilayer on pyrolitic graphite and adsorbed heme (4) the similar peak separation of a {Mb-PSS} 6 multilayer and a PDDA-PSS-heme-PDDA-PSS film, (5) the high electron transfer rate constants of a {Mb-PSS} n multilayer, which is unlikely for electron transfer to protein molecules, but is in line with the electron transfer expected for a layer of adsorbed heme, (6) the fact that desorption of the multilayer induced by high pH does not result in the disappearance of the voltammetric peaks and (7) the fact that a large voltammetric response can be obtained by direct immersion in a Mb-PSS mixture, showing that the formation of multilayers is not necessary. Our conclusion is in apparent disagreement with previous studies on {Mb-PSS} n layer-by-layer films on pyrolitic graphite [22][23][24][25], in which it was concluded that Mb retains a near-native conformation in the layer-by-layer films. This was concluded mainly on the basis of spectroscopic data, which consistently show that Mb retains a near-native conformation.…”