2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1cs00535a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts

Abstract: This tutorial review discusses the similarities and differences between the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to C2+ olefins and oxygenates over Cu-based catalysts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
288
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
288
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, Cu foam showed the largest current densities at −1.5, −1.6 and −1.7 V compared to Cu 2 O NWs and CuO NWs. However, the current densities of gas-phase CO 2 electroreduction over the catalysts were far less than those of aqueous CO 2 electroreduction [26] due to their high charge transfer resistances (Figure S4). That is the conventional aqueous CO 2 electroreduction showed the excellent ion conductivity, which benefited from the strong electrolyte aqueous solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, Cu foam showed the largest current densities at −1.5, −1.6 and −1.7 V compared to Cu 2 O NWs and CuO NWs. However, the current densities of gas-phase CO 2 electroreduction over the catalysts were far less than those of aqueous CO 2 electroreduction [26] due to their high charge transfer resistances (Figure S4). That is the conventional aqueous CO 2 electroreduction showed the excellent ion conductivity, which benefited from the strong electrolyte aqueous solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the conventional aqueous CO electroreduction showed the excellent ion conductivity, which benefited from the stron electrolyte aqueous solution. While gas-phase CO2 electroreduction highly depended o the conductivity of proton exchange membrane, resulting in the low current densitie [26]. In addition, the total FE of the products over Cu foam and CuO NWs were found t be less than 100% over the entire potential range because of high charge transfe resistance and diffusion resistance in gas-solid interface reaction system [25,27,28 Therefore, Cu2O NWs and Cu foam exhibited the preferable activities of gas-phase CO electroreduction to multicarbon oxygenates compared to CuO NWs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrode process is a continuous reaction with multiple basic processes, in order: liquid mass transfer, adsorption, electrochemical reaction, desorption, liquid mass transfer, which obeys the kinetic laws of general heterogeneous catalytic reactions 81 . The interface properties and area, mass transfer kinetics, and new phase formation kinetics all affect the reaction rate 82 . In electrochemical CO2RR, the adsorption strength of intermediates and the next reaction path are affected by many factors 83 , including the morphology and size of the catalyst, the composition and pH of electrolyte, etc.…”
Section: Reaction Routes Of Electrochemical Co2rrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the electrochemical conversion of CO 2 into various carbon products usually requires multiple proton-coupled electron transfer steps through different pathways depending on the kinetics of the electron transfer process, the dissociated protons and key intermediates are essential to determine the final products. 17,18 As one of the highly reduced carbon products, CH 4 is the main component of conventional fuels with the cleanest burning emission in modern energetics. 19,20 Nevertheless, the production of CH 4 involves an eight-electron reduction process together with proton transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%