2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical behavior of poly(3-hexylthiophene). Controlling factors of electric current in electrochemical oxidation of poly(3-hexylthiophene)s in a solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where n ) 1 is the number of electrons transferred, F ) 96487 C/mol is Faraday's constant, R ) 8.314 J/mol • K is the gas constant, T ) 303 K is the temperature, and C R * (mol/L) is the initial ferrocyanide concentration, and v ) 0.05 V/s is the scan rate. The effective diffusion coefficient of K 4 Fe(CN) 6 was calculated as D R ) 5.79 × 10 -6 cm 2 /s from the value of i p using eq 1 with a flat sheet of stainless steel as the working electrode (A ) 7 cm 2 ) (19), which is comparable with that previously reported (∼8 × 10 -6 cm 2 /s; 35 °C) (20). The stainless steel was cleaned prior to tests using 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where n ) 1 is the number of electrons transferred, F ) 96487 C/mol is Faraday's constant, R ) 8.314 J/mol • K is the gas constant, T ) 303 K is the temperature, and C R * (mol/L) is the initial ferrocyanide concentration, and v ) 0.05 V/s is the scan rate. The effective diffusion coefficient of K 4 Fe(CN) 6 was calculated as D R ) 5.79 × 10 -6 cm 2 /s from the value of i p using eq 1 with a flat sheet of stainless steel as the working electrode (A ) 7 cm 2 ) (19), which is comparable with that previously reported (∼8 × 10 -6 cm 2 /s; 35 °C) (20). The stainless steel was cleaned prior to tests using 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reactors were then removed from the glovebox, and CVs were conducted over the range of −0.2 V to +1.0 V. The peak current, i p (A) and effective area of the working electrode was obtained using Matsuda’s equation: i p = 0.4464 × 10 3 n 3 / 2 F 3 / 2 A ( R T ) 1 / 2 D 1 / 2 C R * v 1 / 2 where n = 1 is the number of electrons transferred, F = 96487 C/mol is Faraday’s constant, R = 8.314 J/mol·K is the gas constant, T = 303 K is the temperature, and C R * (mol/L) is the initial ferrocyanide concentration, and v = 0.05 V/s is the scan rate. The effective diffusion coefficient of K 4 Fe(CN) 6 was calculated as D R = 5.79 × 10 −6 cm 2 /s from the value of i p using eq with a flat sheet of stainless steel as the working electrode ( A = 7 cm 2 ) , which is comparable with that previously reported (∼8 × 10 −6 cm 2 /s; 35 °C) . The stainless steel was cleaned prior to tests using 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…16,32 From Table II, we find that ⌬E varies from 148 mV (for PFDMS (M n ϭ 2.79 ϫ 10 5 )) to 162 mV (for PFDMS (M n ϭ 2.9 ϫ 10 4 )), and similar phenomena are observed for PFMPS. ⌬E decreased when the molecular weight increased.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Figure (curve 1) shows the oxidation peaks of RRPHTh at 0.84 and 1.23 V and reduction peaks at 0.98 and 1.21 V. In Figure (curve 2) the ND–RRPHTh films reveal oxidation peaks at 0.24, 0.33, 0.54, and 0.80 V with the reduction potential at 0.14, 0.46, and 1.17 V. The cyclic voltammogram has shown reversibility. The shoulder at 1.21 V could be due to oxidation of RRPHTh; the redox process also shows reversibility. The observed wide anodic and cathodic peaks potential is probably caused by the slow diffusion of the dopant anions (TBATFB) in and out of the film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%