2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00439-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical capacitance of self-ordered mesoporous carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
126
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, 200-220 F g −1 seems to be the upper limit for this type of electrolyte [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. This limit is in agreement with the expected value based on 1500-1600 m 2 g −1 as a realistic upper-bound for the specific surface area of templated mesoporous carbons (see Section 3.1).…”
Section: Specific Capacitance At Low Current Densitysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, 200-220 F g −1 seems to be the upper limit for this type of electrolyte [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. This limit is in agreement with the expected value based on 1500-1600 m 2 g −1 as a realistic upper-bound for the specific surface area of templated mesoporous carbons (see Section 3.1).…”
Section: Specific Capacitance At Low Current Densitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, attempts to find a clear linear relationship between the gravimetric capacitance and surface areas, in particular S BET , have not been conclusive, as the specific capacitance (F m −2 ), may vary strongly from carbon to carbon [5,36,37]. This has been explained by different authors, who suggest that a large fraction of the carbon surface area is not accessible to the electrolyte ions and, consequently, the experimental capacitance (F g −1 ) of these materials depends strongly on the pore size distribution and the connectivity between the pores [5,[23][24][25]31,32,36]. In this context, many studies have been carried out to determine the optimum pore size distribution for the diffusion of the solvated ions within the carbon framework.…”
Section: Specific Capacitance At Low Current Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[14] It has been demonstrated by many research groups that OMCs have much better electrochemical performance than conventional high-surface activated carbon (AC) at high current densities both in aqueous [15] and nonaqueous electrolytes. [16] Compared with a wide pore distribution ranging from micropores to macropores and a random pore connection of AC, the OMCs possess a narrow distribution in the mesopore range and a uniform pore connection, but the obtained capacitance, about 8-10 µF cm −2 , is still below the theoretical value estimated to be 20 µF cm −2 for carbon materials. [16] That indicated, a great part of the pore surface in OMCs cannot be effectively utilized in EDLCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%