2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical degradation and mineralisation of organic dyes in aqueous nitrate solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that glucose compared to acetate was the best co-substrate for ABRX3 decolorization. Recently, complete decolorization of the azo dye methyl orange using an electrochemical approach was recently reported in the study by Sarfo et al [20], as well as an 83% reduction rate of total organic carbon using a simple Cu sheet as a working electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They found that glucose compared to acetate was the best co-substrate for ABRX3 decolorization. Recently, complete decolorization of the azo dye methyl orange using an electrochemical approach was recently reported in the study by Sarfo et al [20], as well as an 83% reduction rate of total organic carbon using a simple Cu sheet as a working electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TW, representative of urban water sources, introduces a spectrum of dissolved ions and organic compounds, potentially influencing the photocatalytic activity of ZnO. On the other hand, SW, with its rich mineral content and saline composition, presents a unique challenge and opportunity for the photocatalytic degradation of MB dye. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up till now, several methods have been conducted to purify wastewater, including flocculation, photocatalysis, membrane separation, ion exchange, and electrochemical processes. [12][13][14][15][16] Unfortunately, the bulk of these techniques are limited by poor adsorption capacity, difficult regeneration, secondary pollution, high energy consumption, and high operation cost. 17,18 Moreover, it's hard to reduce the Cr(VI) concentration to the USEPA or WHO standard with the above technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%