2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical enhancement of optoelectronic performance of transparent and conducting single-walled carbon nanotube films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectral sensitivity of the PV response upon ionic gating changes in the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of small-molecule OPV is less extended, as compared to the EQE modulation in polymeric BHJ OPV, as shown in the Supporting Information in Figure S5. Indeed, in BHJ OPV with PTB7–PCBM-type BHJ, the EQE increases from 40% to over 50% (at 200 nm peak), and the main effect on EQE comes from the change of optical absorption of MWCNTs at the IR tail (upon doping), and C 60 and PCBM in the UV range increasing the 200 nm tails upon IL n-doping, while ionic salt molecules themselves do not contribute to optical absorption and MWCNTs, are still less sensitive to doping effects as compared to SWCNTs (which in fact become more transparent upon ionic gating doping , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral sensitivity of the PV response upon ionic gating changes in the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of small-molecule OPV is less extended, as compared to the EQE modulation in polymeric BHJ OPV, as shown in the Supporting Information in Figure S5. Indeed, in BHJ OPV with PTB7–PCBM-type BHJ, the EQE increases from 40% to over 50% (at 200 nm peak), and the main effect on EQE comes from the change of optical absorption of MWCNTs at the IR tail (upon doping), and C 60 and PCBM in the UV range increasing the 200 nm tails upon IL n-doping, while ionic salt molecules themselves do not contribute to optical absorption and MWCNTs, are still less sensitive to doping effects as compared to SWCNTs (which in fact become more transparent upon ionic gating doping , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of the optical absorption bands of nanotubes is a consequence of the Burstein–Moss shift, , usually observed in degenerate semiconductors. For the SWCNTs, this significantly affects the optical properties of the samples. ,, As in the case of Raman scattering, both methods for varying the impurity concentration (step-by-step doping or different times of exposure to copper chloride) lead to a gradual shift in the Fermi level position, which is manifested in the gradual suppression of the absorption spectra (Figure a). Similar effects are observed when dopants with different concentrations are deposited on the surface of CNTs .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is often important to improve and to tune multiple characteristics of a functional material within the framework of a single technique. For macro-objects based on carbon nanomaterials, tuning is required for the position of the Fermi level, the work function (WF) of the material, and therefore, the optical density and transport characteristics. Control of these properties is necessary for various electronic and optoelectronic devices, such as organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), organic photovoltaic systems, sensors, and heterostructures. , The technological methods for tuning the characteristics of micro- and macro-objects in most cases are based on the deposition of active substances on the surface of nanotubes or other nanomaterials. ,, However, these approaches lead to material contamination, making them difficult to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single‐wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are a promising material for use in photonic and optoelectronic applications [ 1–2 ] due to their superior properties of high carrier mobility, [ 3 ] structure‐tunable bandgap, [ 4 ] and broad optical response. [ 5 ] In particular, the optoelectronic properties of SWCNTs can be modulated by sidewall noncovalent functions, [ 6–10 ] covalent functions, [ 11–14 ] or external electric fields, [ 3,15–22 ] which can broaden the potential application of SWCNTs for biosensors, [ 23,24 ] light emitters and detectors. [ 25,26 ] For example, by creating sp 3 covalent defect dopant states with different emission energies and achieving potential traps deeper than the thermal energy, SWCNT‐based single‐photon sources with desired properties can be produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25,26 ] For example, by creating sp 3 covalent defect dopant states with different emission energies and achieving potential traps deeper than the thermal energy, SWCNT‐based single‐photon sources with desired properties can be produced. [ 12 ] By selectively tuning the Fermi level in SWCNTs into the valence (or conduction) band by chemical or electrical gate doping, the optical transitions between the two different subbands and thus the optical properties of SWCNTs can be finely controlled, [ 15–17,19,20,27,28 ] which provides a platform for designing next‐generation nanoelectronic devices. Among them, electrical gate doping with ionic liquids has advantages in regard to the modulation depth, operating speed of the Fermi level and compatibility with semiconductor processing methods, [ 17,19,21 ] which makes SWCNTs highly attractive for applications in electro‐optical modulators, [ 17,29,30 ] photovoltaic devices, [ 31 ] optical communications, [ 2,32,33 ] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%