2016
DOI: 10.12691/ijcd-2-4-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Immunosensors for Celiac Disease Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the electrodes invented required a very low sample volume without compromising the sensitivity. It successfully operates against anti-gliadins, anti-TG, anti-DGP, antibodies in a multiplex system (Martín-Yerga & Costa-García, 2014). Commercially available immunosensors give useful onsite analysis but the only disadvantage is that they are usually qualitative in nature (Panda & Garber, 2019).…”
Section: Immunosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the electrodes invented required a very low sample volume without compromising the sensitivity. It successfully operates against anti-gliadins, anti-TG, anti-DGP, antibodies in a multiplex system (Martín-Yerga & Costa-García, 2014). Commercially available immunosensors give useful onsite analysis but the only disadvantage is that they are usually qualitative in nature (Panda & Garber, 2019).…”
Section: Immunosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method for the detection of CD biomarkers is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [28,29]. However, electrochemical immunosensors appear as an interesting alternative since they have several advantages such as the increase of sensitivity due to the electrochemical detection, lower sample volumes and, typically, shorter analysis time [3,5,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%