Owing to its simplicity,
selectivity, high yield, and the absence
of byproducts, the “click” azide–alkyne reaction
is widely used in many areas. The reaction is usually catalyzed by
copper(I), which selectively produces the 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole
regioisomer. Ruthenium-based catalysts were later developed to selectively
produce the opposite regioselectivity—the 1,5-disubstituted
1,2,3-triazole isomer. Ruthenium-based catalysis, however, remains
only tested for click reactions in solution, and the suitability of
ruthenium catalysts for surface-based click reactions remains unknown.
Also unknown are the electrical properties of the 1,4- and 1,5-regioisomers,
and to measure them, both isomers need to be assembled on the electrode
surface. Here, we test whether ruthenium catalysts can be used to
catalyze surface azide–alkyne reactions to produce 1,5-disubstituted
1,2,3-triazole, and compare their electrochemical properties, in terms
of surface coverages and electron transfer kinetics, to those of the
compound formed by copper catalysis, 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole
isomer. Results show that ruthenium(II) complexes catalyze the click
reaction on surfaces yielding the 1,5-disubstituted isomer, but the
rate of the reaction is remarkably slower than that of the copper-catalyzed
reaction, and this is related to the size of the catalyst involved
as an intermediate in the reaction. The electron transfer rate constant
(
k
et
) for the ruthenium-catalyzed reaction
is 30% of that measured for the copper-catalyzed 1,4-isomer. The lower
conductivity of the 1,5-isomer is confirmed by performing nonequilibrium
Green’s function computations on relevant model systems. These
findings demonstrate the feasibility of ruthenium-based catalysis
of surface click reactions and point toward an electrical method for
detecting the isomers of click reactions.