2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-013-0536-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical sensing of NADH on NiO nanoparticles-modified carbon paste electrode and fabrication of ethanol dehydrogenase-based biosensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For examples, alumina/graphene oxide nanocomposite modified electrode showed NADH oxidation at 0.45 V and the linear range of detection was from 30–330 μM [12] . Nickel oxide nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode was showed the NADH oxidation at 0.4 V and linear range of detection was from 0.1 to 1.0 mM [55] . The graphite nanosheet modified GCE showed NADH oxidation at 0.32 V and the linear range was from 2 μM to 4.69 mM [56] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For examples, alumina/graphene oxide nanocomposite modified electrode showed NADH oxidation at 0.45 V and the linear range of detection was from 30–330 μM [12] . Nickel oxide nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode was showed the NADH oxidation at 0.4 V and linear range of detection was from 0.1 to 1.0 mM [55] . The graphite nanosheet modified GCE showed NADH oxidation at 0.32 V and the linear range was from 2 μM to 4.69 mM [56] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Nickel oxide nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode was showed the NADH oxidation at 0.4 V and linear range of detection was from 0.1 to 1.0 mM. [55] The graphite nanosheet modified GCE showed NADH oxidation at 0.32 V and the linear range was from 2 μM to 4.69 mM. [56] So, it was obvious that GrÀ W/GCE had reduced the NADH overpotential compared to other reported methods.…”
Section: Electro-catalytic Oxidation Of Nadhmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The GC/CVD‐MWCNT/PT electrode (Figure c) displays little difference with or without PT modification (increase of only 9±3 %at 1 mM NADH), presumably due to the presence of a large amount of metal impurities, which have been shown to oxidise NADH catalytically . In this case, the NADH electrocatalysis may be dominated by the metallic impurities with a negligible contribution from PT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship (Figure 4 inset) between the current and the concentration of NADH is displayed linear concentration ranges from 1.0 to 500.0 μM, sensitivity of 18.9 μA mM À 1 cm À 2 (R 2 = 0.9989), and a low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.002 μM was obtained (S/N = 3). The comparison of amperometric responses of different electrodes with previously reported NADH sensing systems [2,[37][38][39][40][41][42] has been presented in Table 1. The NiNPs/ERGO-ITO electrode prepared in this study was observed to exhibit both lower amperometric response and higher sensitivity to NADH in comparison with others.…”
Section: Amperometric Detection Of Nadh On Ninps/ergo-itomentioning
confidence: 99%