2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical sensor: preparation technique based on electronic tongue in fragrance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noticed that, if the perfumes were split by men or women type, 100% of correct predictive classifications could be obtained (LOO-CV procedure) using LDA models based on the signal profiles of 8 and 9 E-tongue sensors, respectively, selected by the SA algorithm (data not shown). The overall correct classification rates achieved with the lab-made potentiometric E-tongue are of the same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature using E-nose devices coupled with different chemometric techniques (which predictive sensitivities ranged from 71 to 98% when classifying different perfume classes or discriminating them by brand) [14,16] or even with a voltammetric E-tongue [21]. Furthermore, compared to the reported performances achieved with E-nose These results showed, for the first time, that a potentiometric E-tongue could be used as a classifier sensor device for perfume analysis, namely for identifying the main olfactory family.…”
Section: Classification Of Perfumes According To the Main Aroma Familysupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noticed that, if the perfumes were split by men or women type, 100% of correct predictive classifications could be obtained (LOO-CV procedure) using LDA models based on the signal profiles of 8 and 9 E-tongue sensors, respectively, selected by the SA algorithm (data not shown). The overall correct classification rates achieved with the lab-made potentiometric E-tongue are of the same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature using E-nose devices coupled with different chemometric techniques (which predictive sensitivities ranged from 71 to 98% when classifying different perfume classes or discriminating them by brand) [14,16] or even with a voltammetric E-tongue [21]. Furthermore, compared to the reported performances achieved with E-nose These results showed, for the first time, that a potentiometric E-tongue could be used as a classifier sensor device for perfume analysis, namely for identifying the main olfactory family.…”
Section: Classification Of Perfumes According To the Main Aroma Familysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Contrary to other research areas (e.g., food science [20]), in the perfume field, the use of E-tongues is not common. Only one work reported the use of a voltammetric E-tongue for perfume evaluation [21]. The study evaluated the performance of a voltammetric E-tongue to detect the type and concentration of different perfume's fragrances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors were developed to meet the limitations of the human body. 1 Human organs that need to be protected and have limitations are the five human senses. One of the five senses that can directly interact with chemicals is a tongue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%