2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-020-04711-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical sensors between the academic world and harsh reality: a few thoughts on the past, present, and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that issue, 53 essays have been published, in which all authors agree in the statement that any forecasts are most difficult. For electroanalysis, I see the biggest potential in developing very specific biosensors [29,30,31] . For this, electrochemistry combines some great advantages: (i) electrochemical responses can be highly specific, (ii) they can be very sensitive (down to 10 −12 mol/L and less), (iii) they do not interfere in the sample composition, (iv) the hardware for detection is on a very low‐cost level, (v) miniaturization and series production of sensors is possible.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that issue, 53 essays have been published, in which all authors agree in the statement that any forecasts are most difficult. For electroanalysis, I see the biggest potential in developing very specific biosensors [29,30,31] . For this, electrochemistry combines some great advantages: (i) electrochemical responses can be highly specific, (ii) they can be very sensitive (down to 10 −12 mol/L and less), (iii) they do not interfere in the sample composition, (iv) the hardware for detection is on a very low‐cost level, (v) miniaturization and series production of sensors is possible.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%