2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical tuning of layered lithium transition metal oxides for improvement of oxygen evolution reaction

Abstract: Searching for low-cost and efficient catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction has been actively pursued owing to its importance in clean energy generation and storage. While developing new catalysts is important, tuning the electronic structure of existing catalysts over a wide electrochemical potential range can also offer a new direction. Here we demonstrate a method for electrochemical lithium tuning of catalytic materials in organic electrolyte for subsequent enhancement of the catalytic activity in aqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
353
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
15
353
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, significant improvement was achieved through the delithiation process. The explanation for this improvement was similar to that provided by Lu et al [191] The OER performance could be improved because the reduced energy gap between the metal 3d and O 2p orbital effectively promoted the process of forming OOH.…”
Section: Lithium Transition Metal Oxidessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, significant improvement was achieved through the delithiation process. The explanation for this improvement was similar to that provided by Lu et al [191] The OER performance could be improved because the reduced energy gap between the metal 3d and O 2p orbital effectively promoted the process of forming OOH.…”
Section: Lithium Transition Metal Oxidessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Lu et al used lithium-cobalt oxide as a water-splitting catalyst. [191] During the delithiation process, LiCoO 2 undergoes a transformation to the monoclinic Li 0.5 CoO 2 phase and a change of electronic structure, which leads to an improvement of the OER performance. The authors proposed several hypotheses to explain this performance enhancement.…”
Section: Lithium Transition Metal Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current density at 1.65 V versus RHE reaches 51.2 mA cm −2 , which is 1.6 times higher than that of the CoO x ‐air catalyst (31.5 mA cm −2 ) and 4.5 times higher than that of IrO x nanoparticles (11.5 mA cm −2 ). The onset potentials of the CoO x ‐vacuum and CoO x ‐air catalysts are 1.46 and 1.48 V, respectively, which are substantial lower than almost all of the previously reported CoO x OER catalysts9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 21, 23, 24, 26, 40 (see summarized references in Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The diameter of the semicircular arc stands for the charge transfer resistance (R ct ). A small R ct always provides faster charge transfer in the rate-determining step for OER [7,42,55]. According to Fig.…”
Section: Surface Effect Of Ir-pd Alloy Nanocatalysts For Oermentioning
confidence: 99%