2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemically pretreated zeolite-modified carbon-paste electrodes for determination of linuron in an agricultural formulation and water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations obtained from the linear regressions and the R 2 were i p a /µA = (2.70 ± 0.15) + (36.05 ± 0.59) × v 1/2 /V 1/2 s −1/2 ( R = +0.998) and i p c /µA = −(3.47 ± 0.28) − (27.22 ± 0.74) × v 1/2 /V 1/2 s −1/2 ( R = −0.996) for the anodic and cathodic peak currents, respectively. These results are as expected for the redox system investigated and suggest good electrochemical performance for the device proposed . The electrochemical active area of the working electrode was determined using the CV experiments and the Randles‐Sevcik equation, i p = (2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3/2 ACD 1/2 v 1/2 , where i p is the anodic ( i p a ) or cathodic ( i p c ) peak current in amperes, n is the number of electrons involved in the electrochemical reaction, A is the area of the electrode in cm 2 , C is the concentration of the analyte in mol cm −3 , D is the diffusion coefficient of the species (6.39 × 10 −6 cm 2 /s) , and v is the scan rate in V/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The equations obtained from the linear regressions and the R 2 were i p a /µA = (2.70 ± 0.15) + (36.05 ± 0.59) × v 1/2 /V 1/2 s −1/2 ( R = +0.998) and i p c /µA = −(3.47 ± 0.28) − (27.22 ± 0.74) × v 1/2 /V 1/2 s −1/2 ( R = −0.996) for the anodic and cathodic peak currents, respectively. These results are as expected for the redox system investigated and suggest good electrochemical performance for the device proposed . The electrochemical active area of the working electrode was determined using the CV experiments and the Randles‐Sevcik equation, i p = (2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3/2 ACD 1/2 v 1/2 , where i p is the anodic ( i p a ) or cathodic ( i p c ) peak current in amperes, n is the number of electrons involved in the electrochemical reaction, A is the area of the electrode in cm 2 , C is the concentration of the analyte in mol cm −3 , D is the diffusion coefficient of the species (6.39 × 10 −6 cm 2 /s) , and v is the scan rate in V/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The ratio between the anodic and cathodic peak currents ( I pa /I pc ) was ca . 1 for all the electrodes evaluated, which demonstrates the reversibility of the electrochemical process such as expected for the redox probes employed . Moreover, the peak currents showed linear dependence on the square root of the scan rates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To carry out the EIS measurements at fixed potential, an open‐circuit potential (OCP) of around 0.172 V (on average) with a potential perturbation of 10 mV within a frequency range from 10 mHz to 100 kHz was applied in the presence of 1 mmol L −1 each of K 3 Fe(CN) 6 /K 4 Fe(CN) 6 , which were used as redox probes .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIS experiments were employed to investigate the influence of EP on the electron transfer resistance ( R ct ) between solution and the electrode surface. This study was carried out using 1 mmol L −1 each of K 3 Fe(CN) 6 /K 4 Fe(CN) 6 as redox system . The values of R ct were obtained from Nyquist plot simulations through an equivalent circuit composed of resistors and capacitors .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear relationship between the peak current and the square root of the scan rate (insets of Figure A to 4D) suggests a diffusion‐controlled process. These results agree with the expected for the redox couple investigated . The electroactive areas (A eletroactive ) of the electrodes were obtained from the scan rate experiments using Randles‐Sevcik equation ( I p =±(2.69×10 5 ) n 3/2 ACD 1/2 υ 1/2 ) , where I p is the peak current ( I pa , anodic or I pc , cathodic) in amperes; n is the number of electrons involved; A is the electrode area in cm 2 ; C is the analyte concentration in the solution (mol cm −3 ); D is the diffusion coefficient (6.39×10 −6 cm 2 s −1 ) , and υ is the scan rate in V s −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%