1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.17136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodynamics of carbon nanotubes: Dynamic conductivity, impedance boundary conditions, and surface wave propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
256
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
256
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case µ c = 0, (3) was first derived in [20] for graphite (with the addition of a factor to account for the interlayer separation between graphene planes), and corresponds to the intraband conductivity of a single-wall carbon nanotube in the limit of infinite radius [10].…”
Section: Electronic Model Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case µ c = 0, (3) was first derived in [20] for graphite (with the addition of a factor to account for the interlayer separation between graphene planes), and corresponds to the intraband conductivity of a single-wall carbon nanotube in the limit of infinite radius [10].…”
Section: Electronic Model Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromagnetic fields are governed by Maxwell's equations, and the graphene is represented by a conductivity surface [10] that must arise from a microscopic quantum-dynamical model, or from measurement. The method assumes laterally infinite graphene residing at the interface between two dielectrics, in which case classical Maxwell's equations are solved exactly for an arbitrary electrical current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model, however, does not take into account the hexagonal lattice of the underlying graphene sheet and the transverse motion quantization. A full quantum-mechanical treatment, including the hexagonal lattice and the transverse quantization, is given in [31], along with a detailed comparison with the spiral model. The comparison shows that the spiral model represents an adequate description of large-radius CNTs and, due to its analytical tractability, can be useful for qualitative estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19) describes other types of driving field too. Namely, substitution k → i k (for real k) transforms the Hankel function into the correspondent Macdonald function K 0 (x), which represents driving the Rabi wave by surface plasmons guided by a noble-metal wire [14], or carbon nanotube [46].…”
Section: The Cylindrical-wave Drivementioning
confidence: 99%