1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00216-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroextraction of Pb2+ ions from diluted solutions by a process combining ion-exchange textiles and membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To remove lead ions from industrial wastewater, some conventional heavy metal removal processes such as biosorption [5][6][7][8][9], chemical precipitation [10], coagulation, complexing, solvent extraction [11][12][13], electro-membrane processes [14][15][16], ion exchange [17,18], and ion exchange/adsorption on solid surfaces [19] have been developed. However, there are some inherent shortcomings such as requiring a large area of land, a sludge dewatering facility, skillful operators, high capital and regeneration costs and multiple basin configurations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove lead ions from industrial wastewater, some conventional heavy metal removal processes such as biosorption [5][6][7][8][9], chemical precipitation [10], coagulation, complexing, solvent extraction [11][12][13], electro-membrane processes [14][15][16], ion exchange [17,18], and ion exchange/adsorption on solid surfaces [19] have been developed. However, there are some inherent shortcomings such as requiring a large area of land, a sludge dewatering facility, skillful operators, high capital and regeneration costs and multiple basin configurations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the advantages of the EDI process, the treatment of dilute heavy metal wastewater has also been studied by many scholars using different EDI configurations [14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], such as the traditional mixed-bed EDI (EDI-MB), EDI of only cationexchangers (EDI-CB), and the layer bed EDI (EDI-LB). All of the results have shown that the process could remove the heavy metal ions from the wastewater, but many problems exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the traditional mixed-bed EDI [14,19] results in the precipitation of heavy metal hydroxides in the diluate compartment. The EDI filled with only cationexchangers [20][21][22][23][24][25] has a poor water product. The layer bed EDI [14] has a complex structure, and the process of filling with the resins is difficult; the separated bed EDI [22] causes difficulty in equipment amplification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the popular techniques for treating the wastewater containing heavy metals are chemical precipitation [3], adsorption [4,5], bleaching powder oxidation, ferrite process [6], ion-exchange [7,8], biotechnology [9,10] and so on. Chemical precipitation and adsorption are the most widely used techniques to remove heavy metals from wastewater, but the final concentrations of heavy metals rarely meet the discharge standard; ion-exchange can remove heavy metal ions effectively and selectively, but the cost of resin is relatively high [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%