Spectroscopic Methods for Nanomaterials Characterization 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-46140-5.00009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Characterization of Materials by Vector Network Analyzer Experimental Setup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sci. 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 17 systematic experimental errors which could arise due to system imperfections [15]. To avoid EM wave leakage the samples were snugly fitted such that no gap exists between the sample holder and the material as shown in Figure S1.…”
Section: The Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sci. 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 17 systematic experimental errors which could arise due to system imperfections [15]. To avoid EM wave leakage the samples were snugly fitted such that no gap exists between the sample holder and the material as shown in Figure S1.…”
Section: The Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were tightly fitted onto a WR-90 and WR62 waveguides for the EM parameters measurement with Keysight E5071C vector network analyzer (Keysight, USA) in the studied frequency ranges. The VNA was calibrated using a two-port through reflection line (TRL) calibration procedure to eliminate possible systematic experimental errors which could arise due to system imperfections [15]. To avoid EM wave leakage the samples were snugly fitted such that no gap exists between the sample holder and the material as shown in Figure S1.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Properties Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Open field or free space test (2) Shielded box test (3) Coaxial transmission line test (4) Shielded room test Out of the four methods listed, the coaxial transmission line method is one of the most commonly used methods since the results of this technique are repeatable and can be used for a wide range of frequencies. The scattering parameter method is used to calculate the SE theoretically for the coaxial transmission line technique [52,53]. The open-field method is generally used to measure the SE of an entire assembly as an antenna placed in the open space measures the amount of radiation emitted from the electronic device that is kept within a certain distance from the antenna [20,43,54].…”
Section: Of 46mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polarizability is due to contributions from all mechanisms giving maximum permittivity, however, at α-dispersion, the ionic polarization fails to follow the electric field leading to high dielectric loss seen as a dip in real permittivity and a peak in loss factor. The second dispersion known as β-dispersion, in the MHz region is associated with interfacial relaxation at the cell membrane between charges inside cytoplasm and outside the cell membrane in the suspension medium [10]. At GHz frequencies, γ-dispersion occurs as a result of dipolar relaxation of water and several proteins (major constituents of cell cytoplasm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This frequency dependence of permittivity is known as dispersion [ 9 ]. Figure 3 b shows the general trend of dispersions with increase in applied frequency on biomatter [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%