1988
DOI: 10.1080/02726348808908211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Coupling to Transmission Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ATLOG can also treat other kinds of EMP excitation, such as source region EMP [17], as well as various terminating loading conditions [18], but these are not discussed in this manuscript. If we have an aerial line with height h = 10 m and we take the radius to be small a = 1 cm then the electric field at wire surface exceeds the corona threshold E c = 4.5 MV/m [19][20][21] for V ≥ 340 kV (corresponding to about I ≥ 0.8 kA). Alternatively, if we consider a maximum voltage of V = 3.2 MV the corona threshold is reached when the radius is less than a c = 0.15 m. Therefore, the initial peak for maximum coupling parameters is expected to exceed the corona threshold and result in additional losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ATLOG can also treat other kinds of EMP excitation, such as source region EMP [17], as well as various terminating loading conditions [18], but these are not discussed in this manuscript. If we have an aerial line with height h = 10 m and we take the radius to be small a = 1 cm then the electric field at wire surface exceeds the corona threshold E c = 4.5 MV/m [19][20][21] for V ≥ 340 kV (corresponding to about I ≥ 0.8 kA). Alternatively, if we consider a maximum voltage of V = 3.2 MV the corona threshold is reached when the radius is less than a c = 0.15 m. Therefore, the initial peak for maximum coupling parameters is expected to exceed the corona threshold and result in additional losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if we consider a maximum voltage of V = 3.2 MV the corona threshold is reached when the radius is less than a c = 0.15 m. Therefore, the initial peak for maximum coupling parameters is expected to exceed the corona threshold and result in additional losses. Corona [19][20][21] and other nonlinear breakdown effects will not be discussed further in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the popular SPTYWPL23 16B�1.0 type internally shielded railway digital signal cable as an example, the internal structure of the cable is shown in its cross-sectional view (Figure 5). According to Section 2 and the electromagnetic induction coupling theory [27], for any single interference line current i (i ¼ 1; 2; …; n; n ¼ 6 in this study), the effective value of the LEF generated in the signal cable core is…”
Section: Improved Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Section 2 and the electromagnetic induction coupling theory [27], for any single interference line current i (i=1,2,,n, n=6 in this study), the effective value of the LEF generated in the signal cable core is Ei=ZilpiItiS=jωMilpiItiSnormalRSnormalmSnormaln where Zi=jωMi, is the mutual impedance between the i‐th interference line loop and the signal cable loop; ω is the angular frequency of the power frequency current; Mi is the mutual inductance coefficient between the i‐th interference line loop and the signal cable loop; lpi is the parallel length between the i‐th interference line and the signal cable; Iti is the effective value of the traction return‐current in the i‐th interference line; S=SnormalRSnormalmSnormaln, is the comprehensive shielding coefficient of the cable, including the effective shielding coefficients of the metal sheath, that is, SnormalR, and the co‐trough double cable (or multi‐cable), that is, Snormalm, and the shielding coefficient Snormaln of other adjacent metal conductors. Noticeably, in this study, we introduce mutual impedance, inductance etc., all referring to parameters per unit length.…”
Section: Theoretical Derivation and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%