1987
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100050408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyographic analysis of muscles across the elbow joint

Abstract: An electromyographic (EMG) technique was developed to study simultaneously the eight major elbow muscles in five normal subjects. Recordings of EMG activity in elbow muscles were obtained while the elbow joint was subjected to resisted flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction functions. The results indicate that activity in the major elbow muscles is determined by the size of the resultant flexion and extension moments created about the elbow joint, but not by varus and valgus moments. These results suppor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also found the supinator muscle to exhibit moderately strong activity, with a mean activity of 47.2% MVIC. This finding is consistent with previous reports suggesting that resisting forearm supination is the optimal way to recruit the biceps brachii (Funk et al, 1987;Buchanan et al, 1989). The moderately strong activity in biceps brachii long head coupled with the moderately strong activity in short head of biceps brachii and supinator, and minimal activity in elbow flexors (brachialis) and shoulder prime movers (anterior, middle deltoid) suggests that biceps brachii long head was primarily acting as a forearm supinator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study also found the supinator muscle to exhibit moderately strong activity, with a mean activity of 47.2% MVIC. This finding is consistent with previous reports suggesting that resisting forearm supination is the optimal way to recruit the biceps brachii (Funk et al, 1987;Buchanan et al, 1989). The moderately strong activity in biceps brachii long head coupled with the moderately strong activity in short head of biceps brachii and supinator, and minimal activity in elbow flexors (brachialis) and shoulder prime movers (anterior, middle deltoid) suggests that biceps brachii long head was primarily acting as a forearm supinator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is evidence that biceps brachii long head is significantly active in resisted forearm supination, particularly when the muscle is relatively lengthened with the elbow between full extension (08) and 908 of elbow flexion (Funk et al, 1987;Buchanan et al, 1989). The resisted supination external rotation (RSER) test for diagnosis of SLAP lesions, seems to employ such positions and movements by resisting forearm supination from a position of 708 of elbow flexion and 908 of shoulder abduction, while passively externally rotating the shoulder to full shoulder external rotation (Myers et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible discomfort under the wrist clamp from the pressure to bony prominences may partially explain why the torques measured in this study were lower than other studies. Elbow position has also been found to affect both forearm torque and EMG activity [6,13,20]. A more extensive study would involve measurement at other elbow positions including full extension and flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature related to EMG activity of upper limb muscles, especially related to the elbow joint is well documented [3,6]. Although EMG measurements related to forearm muscle activity have been conducted [3,13], these data have not been published in a quantitative manner useful for the purposes stated above.…”
Section: K D Gordon Et Ul I Journul Of Ortltopurrlic Rcscurcli 22 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the assumption of equal muscular forces exerted by both the biceps and brachialis muscles are made according to EMG observations [6], other more sophisticated analytical methods should be used to analyse the model.…”
Section: B Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%