1980
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198012050-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyographic investigation of muscle stretching techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
35
0
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the normalized activity of the two masticatory muscles as well as the two cervical muscles are in agreement with those results obtained in hamstring muscles by Ferber et al (25), Moore and Hutton (26); Osternig et al (31), and Osternig et al (27). For example, Osterning et al (27) reported that the agonist contract–relax technique, a modified technique with similar principles to the AC technique, produced an increase in normalized EMG of the hamstrings in about 71–155% compared with the contract relax and the stretch relax technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in the normalized activity of the two masticatory muscles as well as the two cervical muscles are in agreement with those results obtained in hamstring muscles by Ferber et al (25), Moore and Hutton (26); Osternig et al (31), and Osternig et al (27). For example, Osterning et al (27) reported that the agonist contract–relax technique, a modified technique with similar principles to the AC technique, produced an increase in normalized EMG of the hamstrings in about 71–155% compared with the contract relax and the stretch relax technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, Osterning et al (27) reported that the agonist contract–relax technique, a modified technique with similar principles to the AC technique, produced an increase in normalized EMG of the hamstrings in about 71–155% compared with the contract relax and the stretch relax technique. In addition, the contract–relax and the contract–relax‐antagonist contract techniques have shown to produce median values of 300% and 710% more EMG hamstring activity respectively, over static stretch EMG levels (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A great number of researches proved that various stretching techniques provide various benefits (Cornelius & Rauschuber 1987, Etnyre & Abraham 1986, Moore & Hutton 1980, Osternig et al 1990, Sady, Wortman & Blanke 1982, Sullivan, Dejulia & Worrell 1992, Wallin et al 1985, Wiemann & Hahn 1997, Williford & Smith 1985, Rubini, Costa & Gomes 2007. However, researches do not reveal which technique is more useful exactly and the most popular method of the stretching exercises is proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) which uses inhibition and spinal reflex mechanisms (Kisner, Colby & Borstad 2017, Heyward, & Gibson 2014, and which also uses SS and isometric contractions of the target muscle in a cyclical pattern (Sharman, Cresswell & Riek 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,23,24 In addition to the type of stretch, the stretching techniques of passive, active, 10 and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching have also been examined for effectiveness. [25][26][27] Defi cits in internal rotation have been shown to improve from various active and passive stretching procedures. 23 In addition, there has been suggestion of improvements in ROM pertaining to glenohumeral internal rotation when utilizing PNF techniques with the 2 posterior capsule stretches mentioned previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%