2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron affinity and ionization potential of two-dimensional honeycomb sheets: A first principle study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2018, Cao et al found the twisted bilayer graphene is able to be an insulator or superconductor [ 11 , 12 ]. In the last few decades, scientists have sought and researched some other 2D materials for nanoelectronic, optoelectronic and thermoelectronic devices [ 13 ], such as hexagonal boron nitride ( h -BN) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Zhang et al predicted a novel 2D octagon-structure monolayer of nitrogen [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, Cao et al found the twisted bilayer graphene is able to be an insulator or superconductor [ 11 , 12 ]. In the last few decades, scientists have sought and researched some other 2D materials for nanoelectronic, optoelectronic and thermoelectronic devices [ 13 ], such as hexagonal boron nitride ( h -BN) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Zhang et al predicted a novel 2D octagon-structure monolayer of nitrogen [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Tables 3 – 5 , EA and IE have been calculated for graphene, silicene, and germanene 2D lattices, 40 which are zero gap materials, so EA and IE are the same, and lie approximately midway between our EA/IE values. One could be tempted to argue that E gap and E HL , for large values of n tend to the values calculated for 2D lattices, 40 which show zero gap or, for Si and Ge, very small gaps if spin–orbit coupling is taken into account (see Tables 4 and 5 ). Unfortunately such a conclusion is not justified, due to finite size effects in the short direction of the molecules, as witnessed by the results obtained for hydrogen-saturated nanoribbons, which may show a zero or non-zero band gap depending on the ribbon width or edge shape.…”
Section: Electronic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The average displacements with respect to the molecular plane are reported in Table 1 as a function of the number of rings, together with the values calculated for the 2D infinite lattice, 6 , 40 and for H-saturated armchair nanoribbons ASiNR-9 30 and AGeNR-9. 30 , 33 While the deviations registered for Si-acenes in the range n = 1–6 appear to be constant along the series, for the corresponding Ge counterparts, a slight decrease at increasing molecular size can be observed.…”
Section: Morphological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For undoped (intrinsic) graphene, because of the zero gap, the work function ( is equal to the electron affinity ( , i.e. 4.56 eV [13][14][15][16][17]. While the electron affinity stays unchanged, the work function decreases with increasing gate voltage [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the spin degeneracy of 2, ML-and SL-MoS 2 also exhibit CB valley degeneracies of 6 and 2, raising the total degeneracies to 12 and 4, respectively [24]. DFT calculations show that the electron affinity energy of SL-MoS 2 varies from 4.19 to 4.35 eV [16,25,26], which all fall in the range of the experimentally deduced value of 4.3 0.15 eV for the bulk [27]. To the best of our knowledge, an experimental value of electron affinity of SL-MoS 2 is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%