2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and gamma background in CRESST detectors

Abstract: The CRESST experiment monitors 300 g CaWO 4 crystals as targets for particle interactions in an ultra low background environment. In this paper, we analyze the background spectra that are recorded by three detectors over many weeks of data taking. Understanding these spectra is mandatory if one wants to further reduce the background level, and allows us to cross-check the calibration of the detectors. We identify a variety of sources, such as intrinsic contaminations due to primordial radioisotopes and cosmoge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Proton capture on 182 W (and a successive decay) can result in 179 Ta which decays via EC to 179 Hf with a half-life of 665 d. The EC signature in our detectors is exactly the binding energy of the shell electrons of 179 Hf. In addition to a peak at 65.35 keV (K-shell) which was reported earlier [21] also distinct peaks at 11.27 keV (L1-shell), 10.74 keV (L2-shell) and 2.60 keV (M1-shell) could be identified here. The energies of all identified lines agree within errors with literature values and are listed in Table 1 with their corresponding activities.…”
Section: Beta/gamma Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• Proton capture on 182 W (and a successive decay) can result in 179 Ta which decays via EC to 179 Hf with a half-life of 665 d. The EC signature in our detectors is exactly the binding energy of the shell electrons of 179 Hf. In addition to a peak at 65.35 keV (K-shell) which was reported earlier [21] also distinct peaks at 11.27 keV (L1-shell), 10.74 keV (L2-shell) and 2.60 keV (M1-shell) could be identified here. The energies of all identified lines agree within errors with literature values and are listed in Table 1 with their corresponding activities.…”
Section: Beta/gamma Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…• Proton capture on 183 W can result in 181 W which decays via electron capture (EC) to 181 Ta with a half-life of 121 d. We confirm the presence of a line at 74.02 keV (K-shell + 6.2 keV gamma) [21] with an activity of A K = (58.1 ± 14.5) µBq/kg. To observe higher-order shell EC processes, present statistics is not yet sufficient 3 .…”
Section: Beta/gamma Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall cut efficiency of the template fit is 49.7% for CaWO4 and 52.7% for CaMoO4. The energy resolution of the phonon channel observed in this study is inferior compared with 0.6 keV reported for a phonon detector that uses CaWO4 absorber in a cryogenic Dark Matter search experiment [48]. On the other hand the energy resolution of measured CPSD with CaMoO4 absorber is better than what has been achieved with magnetic metal calorimeter phonon sensors developed for the neutrinoless DBD experiment [49].…”
Section: Phonon Channelscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The legend for both plots are the same. The ovals designate the region of operation for the following low-temperature experiments: CUORE [28], EDELWEISS [40], CRESST [44], CDMS [31], X-ray microcalorimeters for astrophysics [42], and MARE (proposed) [29]. Note that these experiments use different combinations of thermal or athermal measurements, TES or NTD thermometry, and mass per detector unit, so cannot be directly compared to the design presented in this paper.…”
Section: B Detector Design and Expected Performancementioning
confidence: 99%