1985
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.31.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-capture cross sections for low-energy highly charged neon and argon ions from molecular and atomic hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scaling relations apply also for ions in charge states q = 3 and 4 except for reduced energies E/q 1/2 below 100 eV amu −1 . We have compared for both Ne and Ar the cross sections predicted by the scaling formulae with experimental data found in [21][22][23]. The conclusion is that, starting from q = 3, in the range of energies of the order of 100 eV amu −1 the scaled cross sections overestimate the available data for low-charge ions by a factor of 2-3 (up to q = 7 for Ne and q = 10 for Ar [22]).…”
Section: Impurity Modellingmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scaling relations apply also for ions in charge states q = 3 and 4 except for reduced energies E/q 1/2 below 100 eV amu −1 . We have compared for both Ne and Ar the cross sections predicted by the scaling formulae with experimental data found in [21][22][23]. The conclusion is that, starting from q = 3, in the range of energies of the order of 100 eV amu −1 the scaled cross sections overestimate the available data for low-charge ions by a factor of 2-3 (up to q = 7 for Ne and q = 10 for Ar [22]).…”
Section: Impurity Modellingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We have compared for both Ne and Ar the cross sections predicted by the scaling formulae with experimental data found in [21][22][23]. The conclusion is that, starting from q = 3, in the range of energies of the order of 100 eV amu −1 the scaled cross sections overestimate the available data for low-charge ions by a factor of 2-3 (up to q = 7 for Ne and q = 10 for Ar [22]). For q = 2 the overestimation, for both Ar and Ne, is larger by more than one order of magnitude.…”
Section: Impurity Modellingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This term is included to capture the effect of the shortening of the mean free path of neutrals during the neutral diffusion processes due to ionization, dissociation, etc. The D destruction reactions included are (where 'e' in an equation refers to cold thermal electrons and 'RE' to REs) [27,[31][32][33]: goes into both direct ionization and excitation (some of which can then result in ionization through Auger processes). For high-energy electrons impacting lower charge states (0-3) of lower Z species (Ar and down), direct ionization is expected to dominate [45,46].…”
Section: Appendix a Re Plateau 1d Neutral Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reaction (A13), an simple average of analogous reactions involving He 2+ and Ar 2+ is used [38]. For reactions (A14)-(A18), the rate coefficients are estimated from the higher-energy measurements of [39] by extrapolating to lower energy.…”
Section: Appendix Addition Of H − Ne and H 2 To Re Plateau 1d Neutr...mentioning
confidence: 99%