2004
DOI: 10.2172/839813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Conditioning of Technical Aluminium Surfaces: Effect on the Secondary Electron Yield

Abstract: The effect of electron conditioning on commercially aluminium alloys 1100 and 6063 were investigated. Contrary to the assumption that electron conditioning, if performed long enough, can reduce and stabilize the SEY to low values (≤ 1.3, value of many pure elements [1]), the SEY of aluminium did not go lower than 1.8. In fact, it reincreases with continued electron exposure dose.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift indicates the decrease of the yield. Similar effects of the electron bombardment have been reported by other authors [Le Pimpec et al, 2005] for planar oxidized samples. We have observed a very slow relaxation towards the situation before the bombardment with a characteristic time of tens of hours.…”
Section: Experimental Estimation Of the Crossover Energysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shift indicates the decrease of the yield. Similar effects of the electron bombardment have been reported by other authors [Le Pimpec et al, 2005] for planar oxidized samples. We have observed a very slow relaxation towards the situation before the bombardment with a characteristic time of tens of hours.…”
Section: Experimental Estimation Of the Crossover Energysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We should point out that all measurements except the one presented in Fig. 4 were carried out using very small dose of bombardment in order to avoid the conditioning effects of the electron beam [Le Pimpec et al, 2005].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed comparisons with experiments will be a focus of our future work and we hope that our development of MAST-SEY will encourage others to further explore this issues as well. Experimental data reported for aluminum seems to be less consistent (not shown here as it varied widely and no reasonable quantitative comparison is possible), but the more recent ones suggest a maximum SEY for clean aluminum samples to be smaller than 1.8 [43], or even as low as 0.95 [42] value is much closer to the 0.89 obtained here with DFT than the value of 2.87 obtained with SPA, which value is clearly overestimated. All these conclusions indicate that the use of the new DFT based approach available in MAST-SEY significantly improves the result compared to experiment FIG.…”
Section: A Simulation Of Sey Of Copper and Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 73%
“…2,7 Unfortunately, conditioning is a lengthy process and does not always result in SEY reductions. 2,8 Power level restrictions provide a more systematic approach to multipactor suppression. This method involves limiting the RF power to remain below the multipactor threshold.…”
Section: B Multipactor Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%