2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.075204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron energy filtering by a nonplanar potential to enhance the thermoelectric power factor in bulk materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
143
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) at 300∼700K, increasing with the increase temperature. Moreover, based on the Boltzmann transport equations under the relaxation time approximation, the optimal cut-off (barrier height difference) energy level that maximizes the power factor is calculated to be a few k B T above the Fermi level of the matrix, 17 a range that our calculated ∆E B coincidentally falls in, which also supports the proposed energy filtration mechanism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…(3) at 300∼700K, increasing with the increase temperature. Moreover, based on the Boltzmann transport equations under the relaxation time approximation, the optimal cut-off (barrier height difference) energy level that maximizes the power factor is calculated to be a few k B T above the Fermi level of the matrix, 17 a range that our calculated ∆E B coincidentally falls in, which also supports the proposed energy filtration mechanism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…According to theoretical considerations, energy filtering can arise from extended barriers such as heterostructures, nanocomposites, nanoinclusions, or grain boundaries. [9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17] A. Electronic structure calculations…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Whereas filtering may be appropriate as a crude model of the scattering or trapping caused by extended energy barriers such as grain boundaries, 7,12,70 energy-dependent expressions are better suited to account for scattering by charged impurities such as acceptors or even charged nanoinclusions. 13 In Figure 3, we compare the Seebeck coefficient as a function of temperature for different Hall carrier concentrations and different scattering/filtering accounts. In the upper panel, we compare the Seebeck coefficient for constant scattering time with energy-dependent scattering following Equation (2) with s ¼ 1/2 and 3/2.…”
Section: Potential Of Energy Filtering For Znsbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations