1978
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/11/11/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact excitation of magnesium at 10, 20 and 40 eV impact energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
65
9
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
27
65
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and 5. The DCSs at 10 • scattering angle measured by Williams and Trajmar [3] (the errors are not given) are lower than ours by approximately 40% at E 0 = 10 and 20 eV, but higher by approximately 10% at 40 eV. A general conclusion from Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 and 5. The DCSs at 10 • scattering angle measured by Williams and Trajmar [3] (the errors are not given) are lower than ours by approximately 40% at E 0 = 10 and 20 eV, but higher by approximately 10% at 40 eV. A general conclusion from Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The present calculations are presented as well. In the same figures the measured DCSs by Brunger et al [4] and Williams and Trajmar [3] (only at 10 • ) are presented as well as …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present CCC and RMPS calculations are in excellent agreement with each other Figure 2. Differential cross sections for elastic scattering and excitation of the 3 1 P and 3 3 P states of magnesium at 20 eV: (•) present data; ( ) Brunger et al (1989) (3 1 P), Houghton et al (1994) (3 3 P); (×) Williams and Trajmar (1978) Mitroy and McCarthy (1989); (---) FOMBT (Meneses et al 1990); (----) RDW (Kaur et al 1997).…”
Section: Differential Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The previous measurements of Williams and Trajmar (1978) were subject to large (f50%) uncertainties in the cross sections. Thus it has not been possible to test the predictions of the theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%