1982
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/199.1.19p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-ion coupling in rapidly varying sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This emphasizes the long standing problems of the heating and thermalization process (Guilbert, Fabian & Stepney 1982;Ghisellini, Haardt & Fabian 1993;Svensson 1999;Merloni & Fabian 2001). All sources have a cooling time less than the light crossing time so the energy must be present there in some other form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This emphasizes the long standing problems of the heating and thermalization process (Guilbert, Fabian & Stepney 1982;Ghisellini, Haardt & Fabian 1993;Svensson 1999;Merloni & Fabian 2001). All sources have a cooling time less than the light crossing time so the energy must be present there in some other form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many sources are (marginally) above the electron-electron coupling line and all are above the electron-proton line. This emphasizes the long standing problems of the heating and thermalization process (Guilbert, Fabian & Stepney 1982;Ghisellini, Haardt & Fabian 1993;Svensson 1999;Merloni & Fabian 2001). All sources have a cooling time less than the light crossing time so the energy must be present there in some other form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One is because, compared to the corona inside R in , that in the overlapping region must be more strongly cooled by the disk photons, and less efficiently heated by protons due to lower densities. The other is because, at about R cc , the disk surface layer must evaporate into the corona, so it will take a fraction of a second (calculated at R cc ; Guilbert et al 1982) for the evaporated electrons to be heated by protons via Coulomb interaction. Then, the observed T e ∼ 100 keV should be considered as a radial average over the corona.…”
Section: A Possible Interpretation Of the Fast X-ray Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%