Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2037-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Microdiffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In combination, the symmetry elements in this patternsuggest adiffraction group of 6 R . [44,45] Continuing to Figure 3(b),t he perpendicular mirror lines observed in both the ZOLZ and whole patterns give two possibled iffraction groups,2 mm or 2mm1 R . [44,45] Figure3 (c) shows only twofold symmetry in the ZOLZ pattern( which represents the projected crystal symmetry).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In combination, the symmetry elements in this patternsuggest adiffraction group of 6 R . [44,45] Continuing to Figure 3(b),t he perpendicular mirror lines observed in both the ZOLZ and whole patterns give two possibled iffraction groups,2 mm or 2mm1 R . [44,45] Figure3 (c) shows only twofold symmetry in the ZOLZ pattern( which represents the projected crystal symmetry).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The thickness of thin foils may be determined by a variety of methods using a TEM, including the use of the projected width of inclined stacking fault images, a wedge-shaped sample, and the convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) method. [16] Methods involving a cleaved sample provide the most accurate thickness calibration, but this method does not suit the present case because the areas of interest were not in the regions showing thickness fringes. The error involved with the CBED method can be up to 10 pct, [16] and so thickness measurements by CBED are often used as a rough estimation for computer simulations of defects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[16] Methods involving a cleaved sample provide the most accurate thickness calibration, but this method does not suit the present case because the areas of interest were not in the regions showing thickness fringes. The error involved with the CBED method can be up to 10 pct, [16] and so thickness measurements by CBED are often used as a rough estimation for computer simulations of defects. More accurate thickness can be obtained from a computed micrograph showing contrast variation along a dislocation line and comparing this with the experimental image obtained under identical electron beam conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For sub-nanometer probes, the illumination may take the form of a coherent aberrated spherical wave. However, for perfectly crystalline slabs, the variation of intensity in the CBED rocking curve is then the same as for the incoherent case provided the orders do not overlap (Spence & Carpenter, 1986). A source point such as P gives rise to a set of scattered waves which reach the detector at a family of points such as P'.…”
Section: (S)mentioning
confidence: 96%