1949
DOI: 10.1063/1.1698264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Microscope and Diffraction Study of Metal Crystal Textures by Means of Thin Sections

Abstract: Bethe's dynamical theory of electron diffraction in crystals is developed using the approximation of nearly free electrons and Brillouin zones.The use of Brillouin zones in describing electron diffraction phenomena proves to be illuminating since the energy discontinuity at a zone boundary is a fundamental quantity determining the existence of a Bragg reflection. The perturbation of the energy levels at a corner of a Brillouin zone is briefly discussed and the manner in which forbidden reflections may flrise a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological applications of TEM are outside the scope of this review, but a few milestones in TEM of materials will be mentioned. In 1949 Robert Heidenreich of Bell Labs pioneered the study of metals by TEM, using an electrolytic method to prepare sufficiently thin specimens [3]. Seminal work on defects in metals was subsequently carried out by Peter Hirsch and colleagues in Cambridge who reported the first observations of moving dislocations in aluminium [4] and by Walter Bollman of the Battelle Laboratory in Geneva, who observed dislocations in stainless steel [5].…”
Section: The Development Of Transmission Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biological applications of TEM are outside the scope of this review, but a few milestones in TEM of materials will be mentioned. In 1949 Robert Heidenreich of Bell Labs pioneered the study of metals by TEM, using an electrolytic method to prepare sufficiently thin specimens [3]. Seminal work on defects in metals was subsequently carried out by Peter Hirsch and colleagues in Cambridge who reported the first observations of moving dislocations in aluminium [4] and by Walter Bollman of the Battelle Laboratory in Geneva, who observed dislocations in stainless steel [5].…”
Section: The Development Of Transmission Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly useful for light element analysis, and can provide information about bonding and oxidation state. Since the early 1990s, EELS has been increasingly used to study both sp 2 and sp 3 carbon and has helped to provide answers to some long-standing issues in carbon science.…”
Section: The Development Of Transmission Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] The n-value is controlled by grain size 7) or chemical composition. 8) Therefore, microstructure analyses by X-ray diffraction (XRD), [9][10][11] scanning electron microscope (SEM) [12][13][14] and electron backscatter diffraction…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the functional features of EMs before 1950 were so poor that each individual dislocation could not be discriminated when Heidenreich first tried to observe dislocations in metals. 10) As mentioned, the direct observation of dislocations succeeded in 1956, as the functional features of EMs improved. The results were epoch-making, but even 100 kV EMs were not sufficient to determine the correct density of the dislocations, so that frequently no dislocations were observed even in heavily worked specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11) This meant that the value of P is almost saturated at about 500 kV due to the relativistic effect, and increases only 3.3 times compared to the value at 100 kV, even when the accelerating voltage is increased to infinity. 6), 10) Since the value of P was defined as the transmission distance of incident electrons until their intensity decreases to 1/e, most electron microscopists thought that the value of P corresponds to the maximum observable specimen thickness (t M ). 6), 8) This hypothesized voltage dependence of t M also seemed to be supported by some experimental data, 6),12), 13) which, however, did not take into account the objective aperture effect, as shown later.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%