1966
DOI: 10.1139/m66-086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Microscopy of Alkaline Phosphatase of Escherichia Coli

Abstract: A method is described for determining the localization of alkaline phosphatase in the cells of E. coli B with the electron microscope. Enzyme activity, determined by deposition of inorganic phosphate, is located in the exterior layer of the cell wall.Electron microscopy is of great importance in the study of the relationship of enzymes and cell ultrastructures and this application has permitted the localization of some esterases and dehydrogenases (1,4,11). A number of similar experiments concerning dehydrogen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Capnocytophaga, however, in addition to a periplasmic location, AcP and A1P were localized at the cell surface. We believe that this surface location is not an artifact because (i) localization by modified Gomori and immunoferritin in capnobacteria was similar in mid-and late-logarithmically grown cells with only cells in late-stationary phase showing an obvious change in location with slightly more product occurring at the cell surface; (ii) aldehyde pretreatment of E. coli (Kushnarev and Smirnova 1966;Wetzel et al 1970) and P. aeruginosa (Cheng et al 1970b) resulted in a periplasmic space to cell surface shift in Alp reaction product. However, formaldehyde prefixation of Capnocytophaga did not induce a similar shift of product indicating the alteration of membrane permeability by formaldehyde does not alter phosphatase location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In Capnocytophaga, however, in addition to a periplasmic location, AcP and A1P were localized at the cell surface. We believe that this surface location is not an artifact because (i) localization by modified Gomori and immunoferritin in capnobacteria was similar in mid-and late-logarithmically grown cells with only cells in late-stationary phase showing an obvious change in location with slightly more product occurring at the cell surface; (ii) aldehyde pretreatment of E. coli (Kushnarev and Smirnova 1966;Wetzel et al 1970) and P. aeruginosa (Cheng et al 1970b) resulted in a periplasmic space to cell surface shift in Alp reaction product. However, formaldehyde prefixation of Capnocytophaga did not induce a similar shift of product indicating the alteration of membrane permeability by formaldehyde does not alter phosphatase location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…H3-22 (McLean et al 1985). Alkaline phosphatase has been localized by electron microscopy within the outer membrane of E. coli (Kushnarev and Smirnova 1966), and in the periplasmic space in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides succinogenes, and Bacteroides ruminicola (now Fibrobacter succinogenes (Montgomery et al 1988) and Prevotella ruminicola (Shah and Collins 1990), respectively), and in M. elsdenii (Cheng et al 1970;Cheng and Costerton 1973). This paper investigates the cell-associated localization of the phytase activity of two ruminal bacteria, S. ruminantium JY35, and M. multiacidus 46/5(2), as well as the E. coli pSrP.2 strain expressing a heterologous phytase gene from S. ruminantium JY35; and describes a simple technique for electron microscopic localization of bacterial phytase.…”
Section: [Traduit Par La Rédaction] Notes 395mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barrier to the action and free release of the enzymes could, however, be explained as well if the enzymes were attached to or embedded in the cell wall membrane.Efforts have been made to localize the surface enzymes by combining cytochemical and electron microscope techniques. Some studies indicate that wall-associated phosphatases are present in the periplasmic space (8,26), others indicate that they are present at the cell surface (15,20). The pattern of localization obtained appears to be dependent upon the technique used (16,23,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%