1979
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/12/19/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron mobility in heavily doped gallium arsenide due to scattering by potential fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And, as is well known, there is no need to take into account the scattering like that. The necessity of consideration of the coherent scattering along with the noncoherent one arises only if there is a partial ordering in a spatial location of the ionized impurity atoms [15,35].…”
Section: Results Of Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, as is well known, there is no need to take into account the scattering like that. The necessity of consideration of the coherent scattering along with the noncoherent one arises only if there is a partial ordering in a spatial location of the ionized impurity atoms [15,35].…”
Section: Results Of Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figs. 2 and 3 the experimental data are averaged EDRs for the measured values of electron mobility from [6,9,21,[33][34][35], and in Fig. 4 the experimental data are averaged EDRs for the measured values of electron mobility from [33,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Results Of Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case for doped polar semiconductors. A long-standing discrepancy between theoretical and experimental mobility values for moderately to heavily doped n-type GaAs has been noted by many authors [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The fact that calculated mobilities are consistently too high, especially for moderate to heavy doping and low temperatures, has motivated suggestions that compensation effects [7], correlated impurity distributions [4,10], modifications of screening theory for a multi-ion system [3], or multiple scattering from ionized impurities [13] should be included to obtain accurate results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R o may be evaluated using the model proposed by Yanchev et al [34] where the screening length from ionized impurities is approximated by a Thomas-Fermi screening length presented in equation (A.12). The ionized impurity screening length depends on a phenomenological temperature T 0 .…”
Section: * mentioning
confidence: 99%