2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2020.168193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–phonon and electron–electron interaction effects in twisted bilayer graphene

Abstract: By comparing with recently available experimental data from several groups, we critically discuss the manifestation of continuum many body interaction effects in twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) with small twist angles and low carrier densities, which arise naturally within the Dirac cone approximation for the non-interacting band structure. We provide two specific examples of such continuum many body theories: one involving electron-phonon interaction and one involving electron-electron interaction. In both ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 arises (at least partially) from acoustic phonon scattering, using a minimal Dirac model for the tBLG band structure. This viewpoint has earlier been propounded in our theoretical works [9,10] in the context of the tBLG experimental works in [2,3]. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 arises (at least partially) from acoustic phonon scattering, using a minimal Dirac model for the tBLG band structure. This viewpoint has earlier been propounded in our theoretical works [9,10] in the context of the tBLG experimental works in [2,3]. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…weak/strong dependence on ν/θ) is easily explainable based on the phonon scattering mechanism, as discussed below and in our earlier work. [9,10] One should remember that each twist angle in Fig. 2 corresponds to a different sample, with likely unknown variations arising from disorder [14] and twist angle fluctuations [15], making a direct quantitative comparison between results at different angles difficult (and perhaps also explaining some of the nonmonotonicity and the crossing of various lines for |ν| > 1).…”
Section: Theory and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of LKA in monolayer graphene would provide a firm basis for various unique phenomena. In addition, considering that the nonadiabatic EPIs may play a vital role in the superconducting pairing of twisted bilayer graphene [13,14,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], our work might spark significant attention and may offer insight into the underlying physics of superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent remarkable and exciting experimental discoveries in twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG), particularly the existence of correlated insulating phases and superconductivity at low temperatures, and a highly resistive linear-in-temperature resistivity ρ at high temperature, have created tremendous interest in the study of electronic properties of this material [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. A small twist angle θ between the two layers modifies the electronic structure in to moire flat band with θ dependent suppressed Fermi velocity ν F * (θ), which is very much smaller than the bare Fermi velocity ν F in monolayer graphene, consequently leading to a large density of states D(E k ) in the neighborhood of magic angle θ m at which ν F * (θ) = 0 [10,13,14,16]. The θ near θm, acts as one of the tunable parameters in limiting the electronic properties of tBLG, apart from the carrier density n s and temperature T [1,2,4,[9][10][11]13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%