1996
DOI: 10.1002/9780470141557.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Scattering by Small Molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of a scattering theory based approach, [55] the resonance parameters can be extracted from the scattering cross-section or phase shift. Complex Kohn method, [88,89] Schwinger multichannel method, [90,91] Schwinger variational method, [89,92] R-matrix method [93][94][95][96][97] are the notable examples of this approach. The scattering theory based methods can handle the continuum nature of the wavefunction efficiently [89,93,94,[98][99][100] but run into trouble when many-body effects are strong.…”
Section: Chemphyschemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of a scattering theory based approach, [55] the resonance parameters can be extracted from the scattering cross-section or phase shift. Complex Kohn method, [88,89] Schwinger multichannel method, [90,91] Schwinger variational method, [89,92] R-matrix method [93][94][95][96][97] are the notable examples of this approach. The scattering theory based methods can handle the continuum nature of the wavefunction efficiently [89,93,94,[98][99][100] but run into trouble when many-body effects are strong.…”
Section: Chemphyschemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex Kohn method, [88,89] Schwinger multichannel method, [90,91] Schwinger variational method, [89,92] R-matrix method [93][94][95][96][97] are the notable examples of this approach. The scattering theory based methods can handle the continuum nature of the wavefunction efficiently [89,93,94,[98][99][100] but run into trouble when many-body effects are strong. [101] These methods do not afford any chemical insight [102,103] and do not make use of the chemical intuition about the orbitals, charge distributions and their implications for the structural and spectroscopic properties.…”
Section: Chemphyschemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since resonances are embedded and coupled to the continuum, application of standard bound methods to resonances is not straightforward. , Several methods have been developed over the years for the accurate treatment of anion resonances, and with the advent of powerful computers and sophisticated computational algorithms, computing anion resonances of polyatomic systems with increased accuracy has gained more traction. Explicit treatment of the continuum is possible in scattering theory, and hence, methods based on scattering theory ,, have established themselves as powerful tools for studying anion resonances and dissociative electron attachment phenomena. On the other hand, numerous modifications to standard Hermitian electronic structure theory have also enabled a plethora of studies on resonances. ,,,, Electronic structure theory based methods have the advantage of being more user-friendly for a quantum chemist compared to scattering methods, and they also enable chemical interpretation of the states in terms of Dyson orbitals, Franck–Condon factors, and so on .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to group the available computational approaches into two classes according to how the embedding continuum is treated: Class one methods solve the scattering problem explicitly, while class two methods treat the continuum only implicitly and use L 2 wavefunctions. Examples for class one methods include the R-matrix and the complex Kohn method [11][12][13], examples for L 2 methods include complex absorbing potentials (CAP) [4,14], the Hazi-Taylor stabilization (HTS) method [15][16][17], and the regularized analytical continuation (RAC) method [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%