2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron spectroscopic analysis of silver nanoparticles in a soda-glass matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
28
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that though the relaxation energy of around 0.5 eV is developed in the photoemission process due to particle size, the effect has no contribution to the value of the Auger parameter. It has been observed earlier in case of Ag nanoparticles [13] that the change in binding energy due to change in the particle size also leads to the change in Auger peak energy [13]. In the present case, it is also expected that there is a corresponding negative shift in Auger kinetic energy in the relaxation process which nullifies the size effect on Auger parameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is observed that though the relaxation energy of around 0.5 eV is developed in the photoemission process due to particle size, the effect has no contribution to the value of the Auger parameter. It has been observed earlier in case of Ag nanoparticles [13] that the change in binding energy due to change in the particle size also leads to the change in Auger peak energy [13]. In the present case, it is also expected that there is a corresponding negative shift in Auger kinetic energy in the relaxation process which nullifies the size effect on Auger parameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As previously described for other PMFs,42 determining the chemical state of silver on the sole basis of the Ag 3d binding energy is difficult, due to particle size and charging effects. The modified Auger parameter ( α â€Č), defined as the sum of the binding energy of the intense photoemission peak (Ag 3d 5/2 ) with the kinetic energy of the sharpest M 4 N 45 N 45 Auger line, was thus calculated and reached 726.2 eV, in accordance with literature data reported for metallic silver 44–45. The C 1s signal, reported in Figure 3, included the contributions of hydrocarbons bonded to Si (284.4 eV), CïŁżC bonds (285.0 eV), and organic compounds (286.4, 288.2 eV), resulting from plasma decomposition/polymerization of the HMDSO precursor and probably from carbon residues present in the contamination layer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…5C can be assigned to two components. The major component is Ag 0 indicating the formation of AgNPs, and the lesser component is Ag-O-due to the surface of AgNPs being bound to the anionic oxygen of SiO 2 shell [35][36][37]. The peaks at Ag 0 3d 5/2 and Ag 0 3d 3/2 (368.0 eV and 374.0 eV) of Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 -Ag nanocomposite shift to lower binging energy in compared with pure silver (368.2 eV for Ag 3d 5/2 , 374.2 eV for Ag 3d 3/2 ), further confirming that there is an interaction between the SiO 2 shell and AgNPs.…”
Section: The Characterization Of Fe 3 O 4 @Sio 2 -Ag Core-shell Nanocmentioning
confidence: 99%