It has been known since the dawn of modern eclipse observations that the solar corona is structured on all scales from the solar radius to the limit of ground-based imaging (until the advent of adaptive optics, about 1 arcsec). Early space-based imaging at soft x-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) wavelengths confirmed pervasive structure in the hot coronal plasma and added diagnostic power. During the same period, magnetograms revealed structure in the photospheric magnetic field at all observable scales and spawned the study of magnetic flux tubes. Because magnetic pressure dominates gas pressure in the corona (low β), it was clear that the magnetic field guides coronal structure. However, that alone does not dictate the density and temperature structure of the corona or determine on what spatial scales inhomogeneity will occur. It was equally clear that the physical mechanism(s) responsible for heating the corona ultimately determine those scales, and, consequently, that observing them would be key to understanding coronal heating. This leads immediately to the question: What spatial and temporal scales are present, and what scales are theoretically anticipated? In a seminal paper, Parker introduced the idea of topological dissipation: that magnetic flux tubes rooted in the photosphere, jostled by turbulent convection, will progressively develop fine structure down to scales that ultimately result in magnetic reconnection [1]. Parker further developed his theory and coined the term "nanoflare" for such small-scale heating events [2]. Notwithstanding the still-debated applicability of topological dissipation in the corona [3], it seems highly likely that random motions of magnetic footpoints in the photosphere will inevitably lead to very fine-scale structure in the coronal magnetic field. Thus, whether reconnection, wave dissipation, or both are responsible for local heating, the heated volumes are expected to possess structure on similarly fine scales.