1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00043-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron transfer in cytochrome c depends upon the structure of the intervening medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here again it appears that equation 1 gives rates consistent with observation when using the ruthenium to heme conjugated edge distance, especially when taking into account the mobility of certain of these ruthenium labels [32, 36]. Figure 2 shows that the free energy optimized rates for electron tunneling for myoglobin (circles) [10, 37, 38], cytochrome c (diamonds) [36, 37, 39-45], cytochrome b 5 (star) [46, 47] and cytochrome b 562 (squares) [36] fall in line with analogous rates found in the photosynthetic reaction centers (open circles) [2] when using a heme conjugated edge definition. This is the case even when the ruthenium center geometry places it either in approximately in the same plane as the heme, where the metal to conjugated edge distance is much different from the metal to metal distance, or approximately normal to the plane, where there metal to metal and metal to conjugated edge distances are similar.…”
Section: Empirical Electron Tunneling Rate Expressionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Here again it appears that equation 1 gives rates consistent with observation when using the ruthenium to heme conjugated edge distance, especially when taking into account the mobility of certain of these ruthenium labels [32, 36]. Figure 2 shows that the free energy optimized rates for electron tunneling for myoglobin (circles) [10, 37, 38], cytochrome c (diamonds) [36, 37, 39-45], cytochrome b 5 (star) [46, 47] and cytochrome b 562 (squares) [36] fall in line with analogous rates found in the photosynthetic reaction centers (open circles) [2] when using a heme conjugated edge definition. This is the case even when the ruthenium center geometry places it either in approximately in the same plane as the heme, where the metal to conjugated edge distance is much different from the metal to metal distance, or approximately normal to the plane, where there metal to metal and metal to conjugated edge distances are similar.…”
Section: Empirical Electron Tunneling Rate Expressionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…is nearly equal to the estimated reorganization energy for this system (X -0.8 eV) (14); the observed rates are within 5% of the activationless rates (kmax). A plot of log kmax versus RM [RM, metal-metal separation (15)] for Ru-modified azurin is nearly linear (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…We measured ET rates in eight different Ru(bpy)2(im)(HisX)-modified cytochromes c (cyt c) (8,14). However, in contrast to the case with Ru-modified azurin, there is no uniform secondary structure type separating the heme and the seven Ru-binding sites (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussing the comparison of theory with experiment, I will focus principally on the studies by Gray and co-workers, including their paper in this issue of Structure [15]. Whereas a number of systems have been studied experimentally, it is Gray and co-workers who have provided the most extensive comparisons of theory with experiment in their studies of several proteins, particularly cytochrome c and myoglobin, after they have been chemically modified by the addition of a ruthenium compound that serves as a redox partner to the porphyrin chromophore already bound to the protein [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Comparison Of Theory and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%