2005
DOI: 10.1021/ja0526057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Transfer versus Proton Transfer in Gas-Phase Ion/Ion Reactions of Polyprotonated Peptides

Abstract: The ion/ion reactions of several dozen reagent anions with triply protonated cations of the model peptide KGAILKGAILR have been examined to evaluate predictions of a Landau-Zener-based model for the likelihood for electron transfer. Evidence for electron transfer was provided by the appearance of fragment ions unique to electron transfer or electron capture dissociation. Proton transfer and electron transfer are competitive processes for any combination of anionic and cationic reactants. For reagent anions in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
204
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
6
204
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, this entails measurement of the relative contributions of proton transfer versus electron-transfer (PT versus ET), the partitioning between electron-transfer without dissociation (ET,noD) and with dissociation (ETD) within the overall ET channel, the partitioning between the products of backbone cleavages (e.g., the c-and z-type ions) and products from side-chain cleavages within the ETD channel, and the partitioning between the various backbone cleavages channels (i.e., specific c-and z-type ions). It is desirable to compare product partitioning at these various levels because the major effect of a particular variable in an ETD experiment, such as the nature of the reagent anion [29] or the nature of the charge bearing sites on the peptide [22], may be more manifest in one of the levels of partitioning than another. The partitioning of products is related on a percentage basis with the following relationships:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this entails measurement of the relative contributions of proton transfer versus electron-transfer (PT versus ET), the partitioning between electron-transfer without dissociation (ET,noD) and with dissociation (ETD) within the overall ET channel, the partitioning between the products of backbone cleavages (e.g., the c-and z-type ions) and products from side-chain cleavages within the ETD channel, and the partitioning between the various backbone cleavages channels (i.e., specific c-and z-type ions). It is desirable to compare product partitioning at these various levels because the major effect of a particular variable in an ETD experiment, such as the nature of the reagent anion [29] or the nature of the charge bearing sites on the peptide [22], may be more manifest in one of the levels of partitioning than another. The partitioning of products is related on a percentage basis with the following relationships:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parameterized expression for H 12 described by Olson and coworkers [61,62] and based on data collected for the reactions of a number of relatively small singly charged ions was used recently in an examination of parameters that affect proton transfer and electron-transfer in ion/ion reactions of polypeptide cations [20]. This expression allows for an estimation of the coupling matrix based upon EA and RE values:…”
Section: Qualitative Trends In Product Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion/ion reactions can be generally categorized into three types: charge-transfer (including proton and electron-transfer), complex formation, and metal cation exchange. Careful choice of reagents for ion/ion reactions can provide some control over the extent to which each of these reaction pathways contributes to the ion/ion reaction products observed [19,20]. Factors that play important roles in determining the relative contributions of these reaction pathways are the reactant identities, the charges of the reactant ions, and the reaction exothermicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge inverted LKRApYGL-NH 2 [M ϩ 2H] 2ϩ ions were then isolated by using Q3 in the RF/DC mode and subjected to the next step of ion/ion reaction with azobenzene molecular anions (Figure 4d), which were generated through negative APCI and isolated by Q1 in the RF/DC mode when transmitted through the Q1 quadrupole. Azobenzene was chosen as the ETD reagent species because it has been shown previously to lead to relatively high ETD efficiency when reacting with a triply protonated model peptide [45]. Figure 4e shows the electrontransfer ion/ion reaction products after mutual storage of the isolated LKRApYGL-NH 2 [M ϩ H] 2ϩ ions via charge inversion shown in Figure 4c and [DAB ϩ 7H] 7ϩ ions in Figure 4d for 350 ms. Electron-transfer from azobenzene anions to doubly protonated LKRApYGL-NH 2 gave rise to c-and/or z-type fragments at every inter-residue bond as well as fragments from arginine side-chain loss.…”
Section: Sequential Proton-transfer Charge Inversion and Electron-tramentioning
confidence: 99%