2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c09507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronegativity Enhanced Strong Metal–Support Interaction in Ru@F–Ni3N for Enhanced Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution

Abstract: Precious metals (Pt, Ir, Ru, and so on) and related compounds usually demonstrate superb catalytic activity for electrochemical hydrogen production. However, scarcity and stability are still challenges for hydrogen evolution reaction, even for single-atomic-site electrocatalysts. Herein, a fluorine (F) doping strategy is proposed to enhance the strong metal–support interaction between the F-doped Ni3N support and the loaded ruthenium (Ru) species. Via synergistically modulating both the Ru loading amount and F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nearest neighbor peak is ascribed to Ru-F centered at 1.41 Å and Ru-O centered at 1.85 Å. [31] As for Ru 4 @Ti 3 C 2 T x -V S , the ligands of Ru cluster include both -O/-F terminal groups and the carbon atom exposed by the single Ti vacancy. Therefore, the nearest neighbor peak was deconvoluted by the components of Ru-C, Ru-F, and Ru-O paths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The nearest neighbor peak is ascribed to Ru-F centered at 1.41 Å and Ru-O centered at 1.85 Å. [31] As for Ru 4 @Ti 3 C 2 T x -V S , the ligands of Ru cluster include both -O/-F terminal groups and the carbon atom exposed by the single Ti vacancy. Therefore, the nearest neighbor peak was deconvoluted by the components of Ru-C, Ru-F, and Ru-O paths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The full-scan XPS survey spectrum verified the expected elements of W, C, Pt, and O in Pt–WC/CNT (Figure S10). Compared with 5% Pt/C (the two Pt 4f peaks of Pt 0 species at 71.2 and 74.5 eV) (Figure S11), the Pt 4f peaks of Pt–WC/CNT with low Pt load (0.66%, 0.33%, and 0.07%) had obvious positive shift (Figure f and Table S2), revealing that there is strong interaction between Pt and WC. While the counterpart peaks of 3.62% and 2.05% Pt–WC/CNT did not shift significantly, suggesting that the surface Pt in Pt–WC/CNT is in the same state as that in Pt/C. This observation is extraordinary consistent with the crystal facet-oriented growth of the Pt in Pt–WC/CNT, indicating that the strong catalyst–support interaction between WC and Pt is crucial for the preferential growth of Pt (200) facet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure–activity relationships and reaction mechanisms are normally regulated by the structural and electronic properties of heterogeneous catalysts. Particle size of a catalyst plays a key role in optimizing these properties, , which is able to induce the electron perturbation/transfer and the (inverse) oxygen spill-over or activation via strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) or electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI), resulting in changes in the electronic properties and activation of oxygen species. ,,, Furthermore, the geometry and crystal plane exposure of active phase and defects of the lattice (bulk, face, linear, and point defects) can also be manipulated by the particle size .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure–activity relationships and reaction mechanisms are normally regulated by the structural and electronic properties of heterogeneous catalysts. Particle size of a catalyst plays a key role in optimizing these properties, , which is able to induce the electron perturbation/transfer and the (inverse) oxygen spill-over or activation via strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) or electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI), resulting in changes in the electronic properties and activation of oxygen species. ,,, Furthermore, the geometry and crystal plane exposure of active phase and defects of the lattice (bulk, face, linear, and point defects) can also be manipulated by the particle size . In particular, the latter would further affect the amounts of active sites and adjacent sites with optimized physicochemical properties, such as redox, coordination structures, and even electron configuration of coordination fields, which makes active sites be able to stimulate reactant activation and improve the reaction rate with fewer coordination ligands .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%