1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00527332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic absorption spectra and dipole moments for hydrazyl radicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N(19)-C(1) has a still smaller value (1.37 A). Gubanov, Pereliaeva, Chirkov & Matevosian (1970) have calculated bond orders for DPPH [0.436 for N-N, 0.369 for N-C(phenyl) and 0.513 for N-C(picryl)], but they assume that the molecule is planar and that N(19) has ~p hydridization. Their results are therefore not applicable to the DPPH molecules in the crystals, where smaller bond orders are expected due to the non-planarity of the molecules and sp z hybridization at N(19).…”
Section: N-c Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N(19)-C(1) has a still smaller value (1.37 A). Gubanov, Pereliaeva, Chirkov & Matevosian (1970) have calculated bond orders for DPPH [0.436 for N-N, 0.369 for N-C(phenyl) and 0.513 for N-C(picryl)], but they assume that the molecule is planar and that N(19) has ~p hydridization. Their results are therefore not applicable to the DPPH molecules in the crystals, where smaller bond orders are expected due to the non-planarity of the molecules and sp z hybridization at N(19).…”
Section: N-c Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gubanov et al improved on the previous calculations slightly by starting off with a semiempirical self-consistent field (SCF) linear combination of atomic orbital (LCAO) method. 35 However, the calculations were performed assuming that the DPPH • radical was planar. 11 No theoretical geometry optimizations were carried out and the atomic coordinates were not taken from the existing X-ray single crystal structure data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the approximate semiempirical nature of this method, no reliable correlations with the experimental properties and spectra could be made. Gubanov et al improved on the previous calculations slightly by starting off with a semiempirical self-consistent field (SCF) linear combination of atomic orbital (LCAO) method . However, the calculations were performed assuming that the DPPH • radical was planar .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPPH NPs have absorption bands in the UV and visible regions [I and II, respectively] (Figure d). These two bands originate from π−π* transitions of DPPH radicals, and the delocalized radical electron makes a major contribution to II . Both of the NP absorption bands exhibit a size-dependent red shift relative to free DPPH molecules in THF: the bigger the NPs, the larger the red shift, and vice versa (Figure d inset and Figures S2 and S3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These two bands originate from π-π* transitions of DPPH radicals, and the delocalized radical electron makes a major contribution to II. 8 Both of the NP absorption bands exhibit a size-dependent red shift relative to free DPPH molecules in THF: the bigger the NPs, the larger the red shift, and vice versa (Figure 1d inset and Figures S2 and S3). The red shift of these π-π* absorption bands is due to J-type aggregation of DPPH molecules inside an NP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%