Electronic Health Record (EHR)-Based Community Health Measures: An Exploratory Assessment of Perceived Usefulness by Local Health Departments

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the widespread adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems in health care organizations, public health agencies are interested in accessing EHR data to improve health assessment and surveillance. Yet there exist few examples in the U.S. of governmental health agencies using EHR data routinely to examine disease prevalence and other measures of community health. The objective of this study was to explore local health department (LHD) professionals’ perceptions of the usefulness of EHR-based community health measures, and to examine these perceptions in the context of LHDs’ current access and use of sub-county data, data aggregated at geographic levels smaller than county.MethodsTo explore perceived usefulness, we conducted an online survey of LHD professionals in Indiana. One hundred and thirty-three (133) individuals from thirty-one (31) LHDs participated. The survey asked about usefulness of specific community health measures as well as current access to and uses of sub-county population health data. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine respondents’ perceptions, access, and use. A one-way ANOVA (with pairwise comparisons) test was used to compare average scores by LHD size.ResultsRespondents overall indicated moderate agreement on which community health measures might be useful. Perceived usefulness of specific EHR-based community health measures varied by size of respondent’s LHD [F(3, 88) = 3.56, p = 0.017]. Over 70% of survey respondents reported using community health data, but of those < 30% indicated they had access to sub-county level data.ConclusionRespondents generally preferred familiar community health measures versus novel, EHR-based measures that are not in widespread use within health departments. Access to sub-county data is limited but strongly desired. Future research and development is needed as LHD staff gain access to EHR data and apply these data to support the core function of health assessment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5550-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sustainable Community Health

“…Electronic health records are defined as computerized medical information systems (Abdekhoda, Ahmadi, Dehnad, Noruzi, & Gohari, 2016). The increased adoption of electronic health record systems by community health care providers puts forth an opportunity for access to more timely information, providing the opportunity to create small area views of community health (Comer, Gibson, Zou, Rosenman, & Dixon, 2018).…”

Evaluation of an Emergency Department Visit Data Mental Health Dashboard

“…Assessing and monitoring population health comprise one of 10 essential public health services that local health departments (LHDs) provide. To provide this service, LHDs need timely county-level and subcounty-level data to monitor health-related trends, identify health disparities, and inform areas of highest need for interventions as part of their assessment role in the 10 essential public health services 1–5. Some LHDs have evaluated electronic health records as a source of timelier subcounty data for behavioral risk factors and chronic diseases, but incorporating additional data sources requires considerable technological and informatics resources that many LHDs lack 2,3,6–8.…”

“…To provide this service, LHDs need timely county-level and subcounty-level data to monitor health-related trends, identify health disparities, and inform areas of highest need for interventions as part of their assessment role in the 10 essential public health services 1–5. Some LHDs have evaluated electronic health records as a source of timelier subcounty data for behavioral risk factors and chronic diseases, but incorporating additional data sources requires considerable technological and informatics resources that many LHDs lack 2,3,6–8. LHDs without the resources to receive, clean, and analyze additional data do have the option of utilizing existing data sources in novel ways.…”

Well‐Being in the Nation: A Living Library of Measures to Drive Multi‐Sector Population Health Improvement and Address Social Determinants

“…These partnerships have struggled in part because they lack common measures across sectors that can be easily used to drive improvement at the local (subcounty) level. Numerous studies point to the need for more timely data at smaller geographic levels to more effectively focus programs and resources 3,4,5,6 . The absence of a mechanism for multisector collaboration at both the national and the community level to identify common measures and promote learning across sectors, as well as the growing awareness that it is not possible to address social needs or social determinants without such collaboration, contributed to the demand for publicly available measures that support community collaborations to assess population health, address social determinants, and improve well‐being and health equity.…”