Electronic Monitoring in Denmark and Beyond

Gainey, Randy R.

doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12093

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…29 , odnosno njegovom novelom iz 2009. 30 , ali je do donošenja provedbenog propisa trebalo proći još pet godina 31 , odnosno deset za prvu primijenjenu u praksi, i to (isključivo) za potrebe provođenja pilot-projekta 2017. godine. Odredbama Zakona o kaznenom postupku (dalje u tekstu: ZKP) 32 predviđena je uporaba elektroničkog nadzora putem radiofrekvencije, i to za istražni zatvor u domu (čl.…”

Section: Elektronički Nadzor U Hrvatskojunclassified

Primjena elektroničkog nadzora u pojedinim europskim zemljama

Aljinović¹

2023

Polic. sigur. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elektronički nadzor specifičan je modalitet praćenja nad provođenjem alternativnih sankcija, odnosno nadzor nad mjerama opreza ili mjerama prisutnosti okrivljenika u postupku, način izvršenja kazne zatvora ili pak, per se, alternativa kazni zatvora. Unatoč širokom afirmativnom trendu upotrebe elektroničkog nadzora u raznim fazama kaznenog postupka, nisu ga prihvatile sve zapadnoeuropske zemlje, što sugerira da različite kulturne tradicije, ustavne konfiguracije i posebna nacionalna iskustva uvelike utječu na obrasce njegove provedbe. U pojedinim europskim jurisdikcijama koje primjenjuju elektronički nadzor postoje mnoge razlike u njegovoj implementaciji, ali s obzirom na njegovu zastupljenost, može se konstatirati da elektronički nadzor nije kvantitativno relevantna mjera. Također, unatoč predviđenom zakonodavnom okviru, pojedine zemlje nemaju praksu pribjegavanja navedenom modalitetu nadzora. Ovaj rad ima za cilj analizirati i ocijeniti pristup elektroničkom nadzoru u pojedinim europskim zemljama raznim modalitetima njegove primjene u svim fazama kaznenog postupka. Primjenom teorijske metode analizirana je relevantna komparativna literatura u pogledu predmetne materije te se autorica referira na rezultate prijašnjih istraživanja koja su provedena u odnosu na razne aspekte elektroničkog nadzora i njegove korelacije s recidivizmom. Također, upotrebom normativne metode omogućen je uvid u zakonodavno uređenje predmetnog instituta, ali i u primjenu u praksi koja se kreće od mrtvog slova na papiru (npr. Hrvatska), preko normativne suzdržanosti (npr. Njemačka) do širokog dijapazona korištenja u raznim fazama kaznenog postupka i modifikacije primjene (npr. Engleska/Wales, Francuska, Belgija, Nizozemska).

show abstract

Section: Elektronički Nadzor U Hrvatskojunclassified

Primjena elektroničkog nadzora u pojedinim europskim zemljama

Aljinović¹

2023

Polic. sigur. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Increasingly implemented by courts and probation agencies since the 1990s, EM has attracted academic interest in its function and performance. Studies have examined EM application to a range of offenders (Gainey, 2014; Hucklesby, 2008; McCahill and Finn, 2012) and offender views of the tool. Research has alluded to public attitudes towards EM (Bartels and Martinovic, 2017), including public views of EM appropriateness as a sanction for certain crime types (Muftić et al, 2015).…”

Section: Global Em Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, inasmuch as there is a growing use of EM, there is much still to learn (McNeill, 2017). It is not known, for instance, how the public view the rate of recidivism among those subject to EM, such rates varying from 15–80% (Gainey, 2014; Gibbs and King, 2003). Similarly, government agency views of EM have been shown to vary widely across and within national boundaries (Hucklesby et al, 2016; Muftić et al, 2015; Nellis, 2014).…”

Section: Global Em Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic monitoring and monitoring probation: The case of Ireland

Moss

2018

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Set against an environment of diverse reforms across the domestic criminal justice system, including new oversight arrangements, the current article considers how probation in Ireland has almost entirely escaped notice. A case for probation oversight is made on the basis of its caseload size but also a decade of unaccounted use of electronic monitoring (EM). Global EM use highlights questions about domestic probation standards, research and planning. Shortcomings within the legislative consultation process around the tool's role, the lack of any evaluation of EM suppliers and increasing focus on data management to date also bolster a case for oversight of Irish probation. A principal issue within this set of challenges for probation is how EM might adjust traditional agency values. Overall, the contention is made that the assumed exceptionalism of Republic of Ireland's criminal justice system, that which acts as a buffer to change, may no longer be valid.

show abstract

Electronic Monitoring in Denmark and Beyond

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Primjena elektroničkog nadzora u pojedinim europskim zemljama

Primjena elektroničkog nadzora u pojedinim europskim zemljama

Electronic monitoring and monitoring probation: The case of Ireland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About