2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(99)00802-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of microcrystalline silicon investigated by electron spin resonance and transport measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LGBs consist of modified amorphous tissue into which most of the defects and H and possibly O atoms concentrate [5,20], increasing the band gap of LGB.…”
Section: Our Model Of Transport and Its Experimental Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LGBs consist of modified amorphous tissue into which most of the defects and H and possibly O atoms concentrate [5,20], increasing the band gap of LGB.…”
Section: Our Model Of Transport and Its Experimental Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part 4 we illustrate, using new AFM measurements, how AFM artifacts can lead to the incorrect conclusion that the LGBs represent the main transport route and in part 5 we explain what could have been the reasons for misunderstanding of our transport model and conductivity results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the subgap region (below 1.1 eV) our optical absorption is approximately proportional to the spin density, as measured by ESR [2,8], and we can fit our data with a simple model for density of gap states, based on a Gaussian distribution of singly occupied dangling bond states in the gap. The model of Inkson [9,10] is used for the spectral dependence of the photoionization cross section of singly occupied dangling bond and it gives an excellent fit to the measured data (look at full curves in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[11] However, the a-SiEr and lc-SiEr films present g-values of ∼ 2.0030 and ∼ 2.0005, respectively, which are significantly smaller than those of the corresponding series. These small g-values seem to be intrinsically associated with the Er-doping process itself and suggests that n-type films (g −→ 1.998) [16] signal presented by these films (see Figure 3) it was not possible to accurately determine the g-values in these films. Figure 5 shows a series of a-Si films doped with Gd in the ∼ 0 − 7 at.% range, as determined from RBS (see Table I).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%