2009
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200901233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure and Geminate Pair Energetics at Organic–Organic Interfaces: The Case of Pentacene/C60 Heterojunctions

Abstract: Organic semiconductors are characterized by localized states whose energies are predominantly determined by electrostatic interactions with their immediate molecular environment. As a result, the details of the energy landscape at heterojunctions between different organic semiconductors cannot simply be deduced from those of the individual semiconductors, and they have so far remained largely unexplored. Here, microelectrostatic computations are performed to clarify the nature of the electronic structure and g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
259
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
18
259
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the weak temperature dependence of the CT-state dissociation process was attributed to additional driving forces for the charge separation such as dipoles 54 and multipoles 55 at the donor acceptor interface, entropy effects, 3 relaxation processes in energetically disordered densities of states, 4,48,56 charge delocalization on polymer chains, 19,44 nonthermalized (hot) CT-states, [57][58][59][60][61][62] and high local values of the mobility. 17 Such additional driving forces increase the CT-state dissociation probability p CT , and if a cell is not limited by the CT-state dissociation, the temperature induced changes of the dissociation efficiency hardly influence the current-voltage (J-V) characteristics.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For a Weak Temperature Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the weak temperature dependence of the CT-state dissociation process was attributed to additional driving forces for the charge separation such as dipoles 54 and multipoles 55 at the donor acceptor interface, entropy effects, 3 relaxation processes in energetically disordered densities of states, 4,48,56 charge delocalization on polymer chains, 19,44 nonthermalized (hot) CT-states, [57][58][59][60][61][62] and high local values of the mobility. 17 Such additional driving forces increase the CT-state dissociation probability p CT , and if a cell is not limited by the CT-state dissociation, the temperature induced changes of the dissociation efficiency hardly influence the current-voltage (J-V) characteristics.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For a Weak Temperature Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Δ E LUMO represents the potential energy, but according to Marcus theory, the rate in electron transfer that drives charge generation is strongly affected by the difference in Gibbs free energy Δ G 0 between bound and separated state. [ 13 , 44 , 45 ] Factors other than Δ E LUMO , such as nanomorphology, [ 46 ] energetic disorder, [ 38 ] aggregation or crystallinity [ 21 ] and differences in donor -acceptor distances [ 47 ] can contribute to Δ G 0 . These results are in agreement with recent spectroscopic studies of polymer:fullerene systems where we fi nd that materials crystallinity does have a strong impact upon the recombination dynamics of the initially generated polarons.…”
Section: Studies Of Charge Collection Effi Ciency Of the Blend Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vacuum level line-up has indeed been observed at a number of organic-organic semiconductor heterojunctions. [1][2][3] The small potential step of $0.1 eV found at some organic-organic interfaces is explained by small dipoles resulting from polarization of the molecules at the interface 4 and by the weak intermolecular interaction at the interface. 5 A large potential step ( & 0:5 eV) is however observed at a number of organic-organic interfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%