2009
DOI: 10.1021/ic901477m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure and Spectroscopy of [Ru(tpy)2]2+, [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(H2O)]2+, and [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(Cl)]+

Abstract: We use a combined, theoretical and experimental, approach to investigate the spectroscopic properties and electronic structure of three ruthenium polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(tpy)(2)](2+), [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(H(2)O)](2+), and [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(Cl)](+) (tpy = 2,2':6',2''-terpyridine and bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) in acetone, dichloromethane, and water. All three complexes display strong absorption bands in the visible region corresponding to a metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) transition, as well as the emission bands ari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
104
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
15
104
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case also, we find a similar trend, where the Ru‐Npy(central) bond length is around 2.00 Å and the Ru‐Npy(terminal) bond length is ∼2.11 Å . A comparison with the optimized geometry of the [Ru(bpy)(terpy)Cl]+ system also shows a similar trend in the Ru‐Npy distances. In case of the hydroxo complex which happens to be the dominant species at a higher pH(∼12), all the bond distances but the bond trans to the Ru‐hydroxo bond is shorter: a nice illustration of the strong π donating capability of OH − .The bond trans to the metal‐ancillary ligand bond follows the order: 3<1<2<4 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this case also, we find a similar trend, where the Ru‐Npy(central) bond length is around 2.00 Å and the Ru‐Npy(terminal) bond length is ∼2.11 Å . A comparison with the optimized geometry of the [Ru(bpy)(terpy)Cl]+ system also shows a similar trend in the Ru‐Npy distances. In case of the hydroxo complex which happens to be the dominant species at a higher pH(∼12), all the bond distances but the bond trans to the Ru‐hydroxo bond is shorter: a nice illustration of the strong π donating capability of OH − .The bond trans to the metal‐ancillary ligand bond follows the order: 3<1<2<4 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The substitution of halide for water in these complexes results in an increase in the Ru d-orbital energy through π-donation from the halide, leading to the observed red shift. 11 The complexes 4a,b and 17 all contain the 2-(pyrid-2′-yl)-1,8-naphthyridine (pynap) ligand that is considerably more electronegative than bpy and hence the absorptions are shifted to lower energy (564, 568, and 573 nm). The complexes 5−11 all contain a 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) ligand and absorbances fall in the range of 481−523 nm.…”
Section: ■ Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra of all the porphyrin-containing compounds are dominated by the strong Soret absorption band at around 420 nm as well as a maximum in the weaker Qband region at around 545 nm. [67] It seems that, in terms of spectral characteristics, the ruthenium and porphyrin fragments do not perturb each other significantly, resulting in an absorption spectrum that is essentially the sum of both chromophores (see Table 1). These features can also be observed for the single component [Ru(terpy)(bpy)-Cl](PF 6 ) in acetonitrile (acn, Table 1); [65,66] in dcm as solvent, an absorption maximum at 506 nm has been reported.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%